Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 6;17(1):34.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0118-0.

Steps toward improving ethical evaluation in health technology assessment: a proposed framework

Affiliations

Steps toward improving ethical evaluation in health technology assessment: a proposed framework

Nazila Assasi et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: While evaluation of ethical aspects in health technology assessment (HTA) has gained much attention during the past years, the integration of ethics in HTA practice still presents many challenges. In response to the increasing demand for expansion of health technology assessment (HTA) methodology to include ethical issues more systematically, this article reports on a multi-stage study that aimed at construction of a framework for improving the integration of ethics in HTA.

Methods: The framework was developed through the following phases: 1) a systematic review and content analysis of guidance documents for ethics in HTA; 2) identification of factors influencing the integration of ethical considerations in HTA; 3) preparation of an action-oriented framework based on the key elements of the existing guidance documents and identified barriers to and facilitators of their implementation; and 4) expert consultation and revision of the framework.

Results: The proposed framework consists of three main components: an algorithmic flowchart, which exhibits the different steps of an ethical inquiry throughout the HTA process, including: defining the objectives and scope of the evaluation, stakeholder analysis, assessing organizational capacity, framing ethical evaluation questions, ethical analysis, deliberation, and knowledge translation; a stepwise guide, which focuses on the task objectives and potential questions that are required to be addressed at each step; and a list of some commonly recommended or used tools to help facilitate the evaluation process.

Conclusions: The proposed framework can be used to support and promote good practice in integration of ethics into HTA. However, further validation of the framework through case studies and expert consultation is required to establish its utility for HTA practice.

Keywords: Ethics; Framework; Health technology assessment; Model; Tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Algorithmic flowchart for ethical evaluation in HTA

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hofmann BM. Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:423–9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080550. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Assasi N, Schwartz L, Tarride JE, O’Reilly D, Goeree R. Barriers and facilitators influencing ethical evaluation in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31:113–23. doi: 10.1017/S026646231500032X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hofmann B. Why not integrate ethics in HTA: identification and assessment of the reasons. 2014. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assasi N, Schwartz L, Tarride JE, Campbell K, Goeree R. Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14:203–20. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.894464. - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) HTA Core Model® online, Version 2.1 edn. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare; 2014.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources