Presenting risk information in sexual and reproductive health care
- PMID: 27267797
- DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100301
Presenting risk information in sexual and reproductive health care
Abstract
Objectives: Presenting risk information to patients is an important part of clinical encounters. Good risk communication improves patient satisfaction with their care and the decisions they make. In sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH), women frequently need to make decisions based on their perceived risk. Risk perception can be altered by how actual risk is presented to patients.
Methods: Databases were searched using MeSH terms combined with a keyword search for articles relevant to SRH; the search was limited to English language.
Results: Personalised risk communication where a risk score is provided, increases knowledge and slightly increases uptake of screening tests. Decision aids improve a patient's knowledge of the options, create realistic expectations of their benefits and harms, reduce difficulty with decision-making, and increase participation in the process. The most effective way to present risks uses a range of structured, tailored presentation styles; interactive formats are best. Framing the information improves patient understanding. Most people understand natural frequencies or event rates better than probability formats with varying denominators. Expressing changes in risk as an absolute risk reduction or relative risk reduction with baseline risk formats improves understanding. Descriptive terms such as 'low risk' or 'high risk' should be quantified as a frequency rather than a percentage. Using a consistent denominator to portray risk is recommended. Using the 'number needed to treat' and visual aids puts benefits or risks into perspective. The duration of risk should be presented.
Conclusion: Presenting risk information to patients can be optimised using a number of strategies.
Keywords: clinical decision-making; communication of risk; counseling; epidemiology; informed consent; sexual and reproductive health service provision.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Similar articles
-
The effects of absolute risks, relative risks, frequencies, and probabilities on decision quality.J Health Commun. 2011 Aug;16(7):788-801. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.561916. Epub 2011 Jun 1. J Health Commun. 2011. PMID: 21614719
-
Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(12):1420-5. doi: 10.1080/00016340600985198. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006. PMID: 17260215 Review.
-
Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7. Epub 2013 Nov 29. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013. PMID: 24625237 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):336-49. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.12.016. Epub 2006 Jul 24. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16860964 Clinical Trial.
-
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008. PMID: 21631815
Cited by
-
Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology.Gut. 2020 Aug;69(8):1382-1403. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321299. Epub 2020 May 28. Gut. 2020. PMID: 32467090 Free PMC article.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources