Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct 21;37(40):3075-3080.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw206. Epub 2016 Jun 5.

DNA damage-associated biomarkers in studying individual sensitivity to low-dose radiation from cardiovascular imaging

Affiliations
Review

DNA damage-associated biomarkers in studying individual sensitivity to low-dose radiation from cardiovascular imaging

Won Hee Lee et al. Eur Heart J. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the DNA damage-associated biomarkers of ionizing radiation. Multiple types of biomarkers are available for measuring radiation exposure and monitoring the DNA damage and repair, such as cytogenetic, proteomic, genomic, and epigenomic biomarkers. ATM, ataxia-telangiectasia mutated; DSBs, double-strand breaks; lncRNA, long non-coding RNA; miRNA, microRNA; p, phosphate group; p53, tumour protein p53; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of a donor-specific cell-based platform for predicting individual radiosensitivity. Induced pluripotent stem cells obtained through the reprogramming of somatic cells from an individual can be differentiated into various cell types. Different cell types from the same individual can then be exposed to radiation for measurement of cellular responses in vitro using multiple biomarkers. iPSCs, induced pluripotent stem cells; RT, radiation; DNA DSBs, DNA double-strand breaks.

References

    1. Chen J, Einstein AJ, Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Ting HH, Shah ND, Nasir K, Nallamothu BK. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:702–711. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schauer DA, Linton OW. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, medical exposure – are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys 2009;97:1–5. - PubMed
    1. Fazel R, Gerber TC, Balter S, Brenner DJ, Carr JJ, Cerqueira MD, Chen J, Einstein AJ, Krumholz HM, Mahesh M, McCollough CH, Min JK, Morin RL, Nallamothu BK, Nasir K, Redberg RF, Shaw LJ. Approaches to enhancing radiation safety in cardiovascular imaging: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014;130:1730–1748. - PubMed
    1. Lauer MS. Elements of danger – the case of medical imaging. N Engl J Med 2009;361:841–843. - PubMed
    1. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078–2086. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types