Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul;29(7):245-51.
doi: 10.1093/protein/gzw015. Epub 2016 Jun 5.

Consensus protein design

Affiliations
Review

Consensus protein design

Benjamin T Porebski et al. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

A popular and successful strategy in semi-rational design of protein stability is the use of evolutionary information encapsulated in homologous protein sequences. Consensus design is based on the hypothesis that at a given position, the respective consensus amino acid contributes more than average to the stability of the protein than non-conserved amino acids. Here, we review the consensus design approach, its theoretical underpinnings, successes, limitations and challenges, as well as providing a detailed guide to its application in protein engineering.

Keywords: consensus design; multiple sequence alignment; protein stability; semi-rational design; statistical sequence analysis; thermostability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sequence alignment of 12 WW domains across several species and parent proteins. In the consensus, a ‘−’ is a gap, whilst a ‘+’ is an ambiguous position with no consensus. The most conserved residues are highlighted.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Smoothing of five hypothetical energy landscapes by consensus design. Five protein homologues exhibit differences in their energy landscapes, with three containing kinetic traps that present a propensity for misfolding. As the kinetic traps are not conserved across all five homologues, consensus design is capable of smoothing out the energy landscape to eliminate non-conserved features.

References

    1. Alton K., Stabinsky Y., Richards R., Ferguson B., Goldstein L., Altrock B., Miller L., Stebbing N. (1983) The Biology of Interferon System. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 119–128.
    1. Amin N., Liu A.D., Ramer S., Aehle W., Meijer D., Metin M., Wong S., Gualfetti P., Schellenberger V. (2004) Protein Eng., Des. Sel., 17, 787–793. - PubMed
    1. Arnold F.H., Volkov A.A. (1999) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 3, 54–59. - PubMed
    1. Atchley W.R., Wollenberg K.R., Fitch W.M., Terhalle W., Dress A.W. (2000) Mol. Biol. Evol., 17, 164–178. - PubMed
    1. Barrick D., Ferreiro D.U., Komives E.A. (2008) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 18, 27–34. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types