Sonographic evaluation of immobility of normal and endometriotic ovary in detection of deep endometriosis
- PMID: 27281370
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.15990
Sonographic evaluation of immobility of normal and endometriotic ovary in detection of deep endometriosis
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the association between ovarian immobility and presence of endometriomas and assess the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonographic (TVS) ovarian immobility in the detection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).
Methods: This was a multicenter prospective observational study of women presenting with chronic pelvic pain from January 2009 to March 2015. Women with or without history of endometriosis who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis gave a detailed history and underwent specialized TVS in a tertiary referral unit prior to laparoscopy. During TVS, ovarian mobility and the presence of endometriomas were assessed. The relationship between TVS ovarian mobility, with or without endometriomas, and DIE was correlated with the gold standard, diagnosis of endometriosis at laparoscopy.
Results: Included in the analysis were 265 women with preoperative TVS and laparoscopic outcomes. Ovarian immobility on TVS was significantly associated with presence of endometriomas at surgery, with a prevalence of 12.2%, 10.8% and 52.7% for fixation of the left ovary only, the right ovary only and bilateral ovaries, respectively, compared with 4.2%, 3.7% and 7.3% for normal ovaries. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios of TVS ovarian immobility for diagnosis at surgery of immobility of ovaries with endometriomas in the left ovary only were 44.4%, 92.3%, 44.4%, 92.3%, 5.8, 0.6, in the right ovary only were 50.0%, 98.5%, 80.0%, 94.2%, 33.0, 0.5 and bilaterally were 74.4%, 68.6%, 72.5%, 70.6%, 2.4, 0.4, while those for diagnosis of immobility of normal ovaries were 25.0%, 87.9%, 8.3%, 96.4%, 2.1, 0.9 for left ovary only, 14.3%, 92.9%, 7.1%, 96.6%, 2.0, 0.9 for right ovary only and 35.7%, 97.2%, 50.0%, 95.0%, 12.6, 0.7 bilaterally, respectively (P < 0.05 except for normal left and right ovaries with P = 0.2 and 0.4, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for performance of ovarian immobility in the prediction of DIE for all women were 58.3%, 74.1%, 60.6%, 72.2% and in the prediction of need for bowel surgery were 78.2%, 71.1%, 41.3%, 92.6%, respectively.
Conclusions: There is a significant association between ovarian immobility and the presence of endometriomas. Ovarian immobility as a sonographic 'soft marker' of DIE performs better in the presence of endometriomas compared with in normal ovaries. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords: endometrioma; endometriosis; laparoscopy; ovarian mobility; soft markers; transvaginal ultrasound.
Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Re: Sonographic evaluation of immobility of normal and endometriotic ovary in detection of deep endometriosis. B. Gerges, C. Lu, S. Reid, D. Chou, T. Chang and G. Condous. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 793-798.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):695. doi: 10.1002/uog.17508. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28573770 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The association between ultrasound-based 'soft markers' and endometriosis type/location: A prospective observational study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Mar;234:171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Jan 22. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 30708269
-
History, pelvic examination findings and mobility of ovaries as a sonographic marker to detect pelvic adhesions with fixed ovaries.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Mar;40(3):785-90. doi: 10.1111/jog.12234. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014. PMID: 24738122
-
Recurrence of endometriomas after laparoscopic removal: sonographic and clinical follow-up and indication for second surgery.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Jul-Aug;13(4):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.03.002. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16825067
-
Ultrasound Imaging for Ovarian and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.Semin Reprod Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):5-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597127. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Semin Reprod Med. 2017. PMID: 28076877 Review.
-
[The use of transvaginal sonography (TVS) for preoperative diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis].Praxis (Bern 1994). 2009 May 27;98(11):603-7. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157.98.11.603. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2009. PMID: 19472146 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic value of different color ultrasound diagnostic method in endometrial lesions.World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jul 6;9(19):5037-5045. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i19.5037. World J Clin Cases. 2021. PMID: 34307554 Free PMC article.
-
Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Endometriosis: Current Practices and Barriers in Australian Sonographers.Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2025 May 22;28(2):e70003. doi: 10.1002/ajum.70003. eCollection 2025 May. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2025. PMID: 40415951
-
Assessment of the Influence on Spontaneous Pregnancy of Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography.Biomed Res Int. 2018 Sep 20;2018:4901281. doi: 10.1155/2018/4901281. eCollection 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2018. PMID: 30327778 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Expert opinion on the use of transvaginal sonography for presurgical staging and classification of endometriosis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;307(1):5-19. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06766-z. Epub 2022 Nov 11. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 36367580 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Global Trends and Emerging Frontiers on Ovarian Endometriosis: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 24;18:3619-3631. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S527221. eCollection 2025. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025. PMID: 40584644 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical