Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology
- PMID: 27283466
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16000340
Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology
Abstract
Financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive adults have been documented in the labor market, in social transactions in everyday life, and in studies involving experimental economic games. According to the taste-based discrimination model developed by economists, attractiveness-related financial and prosocial biases are the result of preferences or prejudices similar to those displayed toward members of a particular sex, racial, ethnic, or religious group. Other explanations proposed by economists and social psychologists maintain that attractiveness is a marker of personality, intelligence, trustworthiness, professional competence, or productivity. Evolutionary psychologists have argued that attractive adults are favored because they are preferred sexual partners. Evidence that stereotypes about attractive people are causally related to financial or prosocial biases toward them is weak or nonexistent. Consistent with evolutionary explanations, biases in favor of attractive women appear to be more consistent or stronger than those in favor of attractive men, and biases are more consistently reported in interactions between opposite-sex than same-sex individuals. Evolutionary explanations also account for increased prosocial behavior in situations in which attractive individuals are simply bystanders. Finally, evolutionary explanations are consistent with the psychological, physiological, and behavioral changes that occur when individuals are exposed to potential mates, which facilitate the expression of courtship behavior and increase the probability of occurrence of mating. Therefore, multiple lines of evidence suggest that mating motives play a more important role in driving financial and prosocial biases toward attractive adults than previously recognized.
Keywords: attractiveness; behavioral economics; evolutionary psychology; financial decision making; prosocial behavior; stereotypes.
Comment in
-
Explanations for attractiveness-related positive biases in an evolutionary perspective of life history theory.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e24. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000455. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327229
-
Strong but flexible: How fundamental social motives support but sometimes also thwart favorable attractiveness biases.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e20. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000418. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327230
-
Attractiveness biases are the tip of the iceberg in biological markets.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e21. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1600042X. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327231
-
Attention and memory benefits for physical attractiveness may mediate prosocial biases.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e22. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000431. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327232
-
There is more: Intrasexual competitiveness, physical dominance, and intrasexual collaboration.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e23. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000443. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327233
-
It is not all about mating: Attractiveness predicts partner value across multiple relationship domains.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e26. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000479. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327234
-
Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals?Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e25. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000467. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327235
-
Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e31. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000522. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327236
-
The type of behavior and the role of relationship length in mate choice for prosociality among physically attractive individuals.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e27. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000480. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327237
-
Understanding the physical attractiveness literature: Qualitative reviews versus meta-analysis.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e28. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000492. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327238
-
Mating motives are neither necessary nor sufficient to create the beauty premium.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e29. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000509. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327239
-
Oxytocin drives prosocial biases in favor of attractive people.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e30. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000510. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327240
-
Context matters for attractiveness bias.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e33. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000546. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327241
-
The out-of-my-league effect.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e32. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000534. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327242
-
What does evolutionary theory add to stereotype theory in the explanation of attractiveness bias?Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e35. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1600056X. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327243
-
How should we tackle financial and prosocial biases against unattractive people?Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e36. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000571. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327244
-
Just My Imagination: Beauty premium and the evolved mental model.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e37. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000583. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327245
-
Evolutionary explanations for financial and prosocial biases: Beyond mating motivation.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e34. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000558. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327246
-
The biasing effects of appearances go beyond physical attractiveness and mating motives.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e38. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000595. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327247
-
Attractiveness bias: A cognitive explanation.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e43. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000649. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327248
-
Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e44. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000650. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327249
-
An assessment of the mating motive explanation of the beauty premium in market-based settings.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e39. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000601. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327250
-
Attentional and affective biases for attractive females emerge early in development.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e40. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000613. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327251
-
Prosocial behavior as sexual signaling.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e41. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000625. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327252
-
The wolf will live with the lamb.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e42. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000637. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 28327253
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources