The Impact of Optimal Respiratory Gating and Image Noise on Evaluation of Intratumor Heterogeneity on 18F-FDG PET Imaging of Lung Cancer
- PMID: 27283931
- DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.173112
The Impact of Optimal Respiratory Gating and Image Noise on Evaluation of Intratumor Heterogeneity on 18F-FDG PET Imaging of Lung Cancer
Abstract
Accurate measurement of intratumor heterogeneity using parameters of texture on PET images is essential for precise characterization of cancer lesions. In this study, we investigated the influence of respiratory motion and varying noise levels on quantification of textural parameters in patients with lung cancer.
Methods: We used an optimal-respiratory-gating algorithm on the list-mode data of 60 lung cancer patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET. The images were reconstructed using a duty cycle of 35% (percentage of the total acquired PET data). In addition, nongated images of varying statistical quality (using 35% and 100% of the PET data) were reconstructed to investigate the effects of image noise. Several global image-derived indices and textural parameters (entropy, high-intensity emphasis, zone percentage, and dissimilarity) that have been associated with patient outcome were calculated. The clinical impact of optimal respiratory gating and image noise on assessment of intratumor heterogeneity was evaluated using Cox regression models, with overall survival as the outcome measure. The threshold for statistical significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction.
Results: In the lower lung lobes, respiratory motion significantly affected quantification of intratumor heterogeneity for all textural parameters (P < 0.007) except entropy (P > 0.007). The mean increase in entropy, dissimilarity, zone percentage, and high-intensity emphasis was 1.3% ± 1.5% (P = 0.02), 11.6% ± 11.8% (P = 0.006), 2.3% ± 2.2% (P = 0.002), and 16.8% ± 17.2% (P = 0.006), respectively. No significant differences were observed for lesions in the upper lung lobes (P > 0.007). Differences in the statistical quality of the PET images affected the textural parameters less than respiratory motion, with no significant difference observed. The median follow-up time was 35 mo (range, 7-39 mo). In multivariate analysis for overall survival, total lesion glycolysis and high-intensity emphasis were the two most relevant image-derived indices and were considered to be independent significant covariates for the model regardless of the image type considered.
Conclusion: The tested textural parameters are robust in the presence of respiratory motion artifacts and varying levels of image noise.
Keywords: 18F-FDG PET/CT; lung cancer; radiomics; respiratory gating; total lesion glycolysis.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Impact of a new respiratory amplitude-based gating technique in evaluation of upper abdominal PET lesions.Eur J Radiol. 2014 Mar;83(3):509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 24. Eur J Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24332351
-
The effect of 18F-FDG-PET/CT respiratory gating on detected metabolic activity in lung lesions.Ann Nucl Med. 2009 Feb;23(2):191-6. doi: 10.1007/s12149-008-0225-1. Epub 2009 Feb 19. Ann Nucl Med. 2009. PMID: 19225943
-
Frequency based gating: An alternative, conformal, approach to 4D PET data utilization.Med Phys. 2016 Mar;43(3):1451-61. doi: 10.1118/1.4941956. Med Phys. 2016. PMID: 26936729
-
Added Value of Respiratory Gating in Positron Emission Tomography for the Clinical Management of Lung Cancer Patients.Semin Nucl Med. 2022 Nov;52(6):745-758. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 25. Semin Nucl Med. 2022. PMID: 35643531 Review.
-
Respiratory Gating and the Performance of PET/CT in Pulmonary Lesions.Curr Radiopharm. 2020;13(3):218-227. doi: 10.2174/1874471013666200317144629. Curr Radiopharm. 2020. PMID: 32183685 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The developing role of FDG PET imaging for prognostication and radiotherapy target volume delineation in non-small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug;10(Suppl 21):S2508-S2521. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.101. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 30206495 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantification of Lung PET Images: Challenges and Opportunities.J Nucl Med. 2017 Feb;58(2):201-207. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.184796. Epub 2017 Jan 12. J Nucl Med. 2017. PMID: 28082432 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection.Insights Imaging. 2020 Aug 12;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00887-2. Insights Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32785796 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiomics in Oncological PET/CT: a Methodological Overview.Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Feb;53(1):14-29. doi: 10.1007/s13139-019-00571-4. Epub 2019 Jan 15. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30828395 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Dec;46(13):2638-2655. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04391-8. Epub 2019 Jun 25. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31240330 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical