Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 10;11(6):e0156131.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156131. eCollection 2016.

Defining the Active Fraction of Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Using a Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Approach

Affiliations

Defining the Active Fraction of Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Using a Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Approach

Samira M Garonzik et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Our objective was to study the pharmacodynamics of daptomycin in the presence of varying concentrations of human serum (HS) in vitro to quantify the fraction of daptomycin that is 'active'. Time kill experiments were performed with daptomycin (0 to 256 mg/L) against two MRSA strains at log-phase growth, in the presence of HS (0%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%) combined with Mueller-Hinton broth. Daptomycin ≥ 2 mg/L achieved 99.9% kill within 8 h at all HS concentrations; early killing activity was slightly attenuated at higher HS concentrations. After 1 h, bacterial reduction of USA300 upon exposure to daptomycin 4 mg/L ranged from -3.1 to -0.5 log10CFU/mL in the presence of 0% to 70% HS, respectively. Bactericidal activity was achieved against both strains at daptomycin ≥ 4 mg/L for all fractions of HS exposure. A mechanism-based mathematical model (MBM) was developed to estimate the active daptomycin fraction at each %HS, comprising 3 bacterial subpopulations differing in daptomycin susceptibility. Time-kill data were fit with this MBM with excellent precision (r2 >0.95). The active fraction of daptomycin was estimated to range from 34.6% to 25.2% at HS fractions of 10% to 70%, respectively. Despite the reported low unbound fraction of daptomycin, the impact of protein binding on the activity of daptomycin was modest. The active fraction approach can be utilized to design in vitro experiments and to optimize therapeutic regimens of daptomycin in humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The daptomycin powder used in the experiments was provided to Brian T. Tsuji by Cubist Pharmaceuticals. However, this does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Structural mathematical model for bacterial growth and killing by daptomycin showing both states of the susceptible population (intermediate and ‘resistant’ population not shown).
Fig 2
Fig 2
Bacterial killing activity of daptomycin against MRSA USA300 (panels A to E) and VISA Mu50 (panels F to J). Each panel represents increasing v/v ratios of human serum and MHB (0 to 70%).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Pharmacodynamic relationship between total daptomycin concentration and the log ratio area at each condition of human serum exposure against USA300.
All r2 values were >0.97. Similar results were obtained for Mu50.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Time kill data (symbols) and model fitted predictions (solid lines) for each condition of human serum exposure for daptomycin against USA300.
Each panel represents increasing v/v ratios of human serum and MHB as follows: 0% human serum (panel A), 10% human serum (panel B), 30% human serum (panel C), 50% human serum (panel D) and 70% human serum (panel E).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Observed relationship between each concentration of human serum exposure and model estimated active fraction values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wise R. The clinical relevance of protein binding and tissue concentrations in antimicrobial therapy. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1986;11(6):470–82. Epub 1986/11/01. . - PubMed
    1. Zeitlinger MA, Derendorf H, Mouton JW, Cars O, Craig WA, Andes D, et al. Protein binding: do we ever learn? Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2011;55(7):3067–74. Epub 2011/05/04. 10.1128/aac.01433-10 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craig WA, Welling PG. Protein binding of antimicrobials: clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1977;2(4):252–68. Epub 1977/07/01. . - PubMed
    1. Gould IM, David MZ, Esposito S, Garau J, Lina G, Mazzei T, et al. New insights into meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pathogenesis, treatment and resistance. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 2012;39(2):96–104. Epub 2011/12/27. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.028 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsuji BT, von Eiff C, Kelchlin PA, Forrest A, Smith PF. Attenuated vancomycin bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus hemB mutants expressing the small-colony-variant phenotype. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2008;52(4):1533–7. Epub 2008/02/21. 10.1128/aac.01254-07 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2292514. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources