Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;60(7):795-811.
doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew034. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

SYN-JEM: A Quantitative Job-Exposure Matrix for Five Lung Carcinogens

Susan Peters  1 , Roel Vermeulen  2 , Lützen Portengen  3 , Ann Olsson  4 , Benjamin Kendzia  5 , Raymond Vincent  6 , Barbara Savary  6 , Jérôme Lavoué  7 , Domenico Cavallo  8 , Andrea Cattaneo  8 , Dario Mirabelli  9 , Nils Plato  10 , Joelle Fevotte  11 , Beate Pesch  5 , Thomas Brüning  5 , Kurt Straif  4 , Hans Kromhout  3
Affiliations

SYN-JEM: A Quantitative Job-Exposure Matrix for Five Lung Carcinogens

Susan Peters et al. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The use of measurement data in occupational exposure assessment allows more quantitative analyses of possible exposure-response relations. We describe a quantitative exposure assessment approach for five lung carcinogens (i.e. asbestos, chromium-VI, nickel, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (by its proxy benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)) and respirable crystalline silica). A quantitative job-exposure matrix (JEM) was developed based on statistical modeling of large quantities of personal measurements.

Methods: Empirical linear models were developed using personal occupational exposure measurements (n = 102306) from Europe and Canada, as well as auxiliary information like job (industry), year of sampling, region, an a priori exposure rating of each job (none, low, and high exposed), sampling and analytical methods, and sampling duration. The model outcomes were used to create a JEM with a quantitative estimate of the level of exposure by job, year, and region.

Results: Decreasing time trends were observed for all agents between the 1970s and 2009, ranging from -1.2% per year for personal BaP and nickel exposures to -10.7% for asbestos (in the time period before an asbestos ban was implemented). Regional differences in exposure concentrations (adjusted for measured jobs, years of measurement, and sampling method and duration) varied by agent, ranging from a factor 3.3 for chromium-VI up to a factor 10.5 for asbestos.

Conclusion: We estimated time-, job-, and region-specific exposure levels for four (asbestos, chromium-VI, nickel, and RCS) out of five considered lung carcinogens. Through statistical modeling of large amounts of personal occupational exposure measurement data we were able to derive a quantitative JEM to be used in community-based studies.

Keywords: asbestos exposure; chromium; exposure assessment; exposure assessment—mixed models; nickel; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; respirable crystalline silica; retrospective exposure assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer