Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul;21(7):832-9.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0416. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

Founder and Recurrent Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Latin American Countries: State of the Art and Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Founder and Recurrent Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Latin American Countries: State of the Art and Literature Review

Carlos Andrés Ossa et al. Oncologist. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Numerous epidemiological factors affect the probability of developing breast or ovarian cancer, but no predictor is as determinant as inheriting a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. The concept of the founder effect explains the reduced genetic variability in some populations, according to the theory that new populations can be formed from a reduced number of individuals, so the new population would carry only a small fraction of the genetic variability of the original population. The main purpose of this review is to provide an update on the state of the art in founder mutations and some recurrent mutations that have recently been described in Latin America.

Methods: A literature search was performed in the electronic databases of PUBMED, EMBASE, LILACS, and BIREME using the terms BRCA1, BRCA2, founder mutation, Latin American population, and Hispanic. Sixty-two papers were identified, of which 38 were considered relevant for this review. Each result is shown per country.

Results: In Latin America, clear founder effects have been reported in Mexico (BRCA1 del exons 9-12), Brazil (BRCA1 5382insC and BRCA2 c.156_157insAlu), and Colombia (BRCA1 3450del4, A1708E, and BRCA2 3034del4) and in Latinas residing in Southern California (BRCA1 185delAG, IVS5+1G>A, S955x, and R1443x). Of these, mutation BRCA1 3450del4 has also been reported in Brazil and Chile, whereas mutation BRCA2 3034del4 has been reported in Argentina and Peru. These data support the idea that although most Hispanic populations are the result of a mixture between Europeans, Africans, and Amerindians, the relative proportion of each genetic component varies throughout the Hispanic populations, making it necessary to identify the mutations characteristic of each population to generate mutation profiles adjusted to each one of them.

Conclusion: In Latin American countries, and even among regions of the same country, there is great heterogeneity of ancestors. Therefore, Latinas should not be analyzed like other population groups without taking into account their genetic ancestry. The presence of founder mutations in specific population groups represents a cost-effective analysis. The importance of determining the founder mutations lies mainly in the decrease in costs. If we manage to decrease costs, screenings could be offered more widely and cover a larger number of women.

Implications for practice: Hispanic and African-American populations are four to five times less likely than other populations worldwide to receive screening for BRCA mutations, a main reason being the high costs of these tools. The present study seeks to identify the prevalent mutations and the founder effect in the BRCA gene in the Hispanic population to address specific panels for this population group in the future and develop strategies for population screening.

Keywords: BRCA1; BRCA2; Breast cancer; Hereditary cancer; Hispanics; Latin America.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Countries with studies of founder or recurrent mutations in Latin America reported to date.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Analysis of the pathogenic variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 using next-generation sequencing in women with familial breast cancer: a case-control study.
    Zayas-Villanueva OA, Campos-Acevedo LD, Lugo-Trampe JJ, Hernández-Barajas D, González-Guerrero JF, Noriega-Iriondo MF, Ramírez-Sánchez IA, Martínez-de-Villarreal LE. Zayas-Villanueva OA, et al. BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5950-4. BMC Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31331294 Free PMC article.
  • Genetics of breast cancer in African populations: a literature review.
    Abbad A, Baba H, Dehbi H, Elmessaoudi-Idrissi M, Elyazghi Z, Abidi O, Radouani F. Abbad A, et al. Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2018 May 11;3:e8. doi: 10.1017/gheg.2018.8. eCollection 2018. Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2018. PMID: 30263132 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Analysis of Heterozygous BRCA1 5382ins Founder Mutation in a Cohort of Egyptian Breast Cancer Female Patients Using Pyrosequencing Technique.
    Gomaa Mogahed SH, Hamed YS, Ibrahim Moursy YE, Mahomoud Saied MH. Gomaa Mogahed SH, et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):431-438. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.2.431. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020. PMID: 32102521 Free PMC article.
  • A scalable, aggregated genotypic-phenotypic database for human disease variation.
    Barrett R, Neben CL, Zimmer AD, Mishne G, McKennon W, Zhou AY, Ginsberg J. Barrett R, et al. Database (Oxford). 2019 Jan 1;2019:baz013. doi: 10.1093/database/baz013. Database (Oxford). 2019. PMID: 30759220 Free PMC article.
  • Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
    Rebbeck TR, Friebel TM, Friedman E, Hamann U, Huo D, Kwong A, Olah E, Olopade OI, Solano AR, Teo SH, Thomassen M, Weitzel JN, Chan TL, Couch FJ, Goldgar DE, Kruse TA, Palmero EI, Park SK, Torres D, van Rensburg EJ, McGuffog L, Parsons MT, Leslie G, Aalfs CM, Abugattas J, Adlard J, Agata S, Aittomäki K, Andrews L, Andrulis IL, Arason A, Arnold N, Arun BK, Asseryanis E, Auerbach L, Azzollini J, Balmaña J, Barile M, Barkardottir RB, Barrowdale D, Benitez J, Berger A, Berger R, Blanco AM, Blazer KR, Blok MJ, Bonadona V, Bonanni B, Bradbury AR, Brewer C, Buecher B, Buys SS, Caldes T, Caliebe A, Caligo MA, Campbell I, Caputo SM, Chiquette J, Chung WK, Claes KBM, Collée JM, Cook J, Davidson R, de la Hoya M, De Leeneer K, de Pauw A, Delnatte C, Diez O, Ding YC, Ditsch N, Domchek SM, Dorfling CM, Velazquez C, Dworniczak B, Eason J, Easton DF, Eeles R, Ehrencrona H, Ejlertsen B; EMBRACE; Engel C, Engert S, Evans DG, Faivre L, Feliubadaló L, Ferrer SF, Foretova L, Fowler J, Frost D, Galvão HCR, Ganz PA, Garber J, Gauthier-Villars M, Gehrig A; GEMO Study Collaborators; Gerdes AM, Gesta P, Giannini G, Giraud S, Glendon G, Godwin AK, Greene MH, Gronwald J, Gutierrez-Barrera A, Hahnen E, Hauke J… See abstract for full author list ➔ Rebbeck TR, et al. Hum Mutat. 2018 May;39(5):593-620. doi: 10.1002/humu.23406. Epub 2018 Mar 12. Hum Mutat. 2018. PMID: 29446198 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Ferla R, Calò V, Cascio S, et al. Founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(suppl 6):vi93–vi98. - PubMed
    1. Fackenthal JD, Olopade OI. Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:937–948. - PubMed
    1. Foulkes WD, Shuen AY. In brief: BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Pathol. 2013;230:347–349. - PubMed
    1. Foulkes WD. BRCA1 and BRCA2—update and implications on the genetics of breast cancer: a clinical perspective. Clin Genet. 2014;85:1–4. - PubMed
    1. Barnes DR, Antoniou AC. Unravelling modifiers of breast and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Update on genetic modifiers. J Intern Med. 2012;271:331–343. - PubMed