Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1989 May;50(5):235-9.
doi: 10.1080/15298668991374570.

Enumeration of viable fungi in occupational environments: a comparison of samplers and media

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Enumeration of viable fungi in occupational environments: a comparison of samplers and media

T Smid et al. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1989 May.

Erratum in

  • Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1990 May;51(5):296

Abstract

The performance of sampling for fungi using four widely used microbiological air sampling devices and three broad spectrum media was compared in seven occupational settings. Total colony forming units counts ranged from 10 to 3700 CFU/m3. The sampling efficiencies of the Andersen N-6 sampler, slit sampler, and Reuter centrifugal air sampler (RCS) were comparable, whereas the SAS sampler underestimated CFU counts by approximately 50%. The correlation between the RCS results and the other three samplers used was lower compared to their mutual correlations. There were no large differences in performance of the three media tested: malt extract agar, dichloran glycerol (18) agar, and dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar. Coefficients of variation of duplicate samples were large compared to commonly used methods for sampling dust and chemicals. It is concluded that the N-6 and slit sampler perform best, although RCS is useful in probes because it is easy to handle. The three media tested yielded similar results. Further testing of DG-18 is recommended, as it inhibits fast growing genera and, thus, counting colonies is easier.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types