Pretreatment surgical staging in cervical carcinoma: therapeutic efficacy of pelvic lymph node resection
- PMID: 2729382
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90160-9
Pretreatment surgical staging in cervical carcinoma: therapeutic efficacy of pelvic lymph node resection
Abstract
Pretreatment surgical staging in cervical carcinoma has been studied extensively to define a group for extended field radiation or adjuvant chemotherapy. A theoretical, but as yet unproved, benefit from this surgery is the resection of large, presumably radioresistant, pelvic nodal metastases before radiation therapy. One hundred fifty-six patients were divided by pelvic nodal status after surgical staging with excision of pelvic lymph nodes: group A, negative (n = 81); group B, microscopic metastases only (n = 18); group C, macroscopic nodal metastases resected (n = 48); and group D, unresectable nodal metastases (n = 9). The 5-year recurrence-free survival in group C (51%) approached that of group B (57%) and was significantly better than that of group D (0%). The groups are compared by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, grade, histology, and incidence of paraaortic metastases. Patterns of recurrence imply improved pelvic control in patients undergoing resection of pelvic nodal metastases. Surgical removal of pelvic nodal metastases before radiation therapy is recommended.
Similar articles
-
Pretreatment surgical staging of patients with cervical carcinoma: the case for lymph node debulking.Cancer. 1998 Jun 1;82(11):2241-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980601)82:11<2241::aid-cncr20>3.0.co;2-t. Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9610705
-
Interest of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage IB and II cervical carcinoma.Gynecol Oncol. 1999 Apr;73(1):106-10. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5308. Gynecol Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10094889 Clinical Trial.
-
Survival after extraperitoneal pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in cervical carcinoma.Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jan;57(1):90-5. Obstet Gynecol. 1981. PMID: 7454181
-
Surgical staging of cervical cancer.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Dec;33(4):852-62. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199012000-00021. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990. PMID: 2289352 Review.
-
Para-aortic nodal metastases in cervical cancer: a blind spot in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system: current diagnosis and management.Future Oncol. 2015;11(2):309-22. doi: 10.2217/fon.14.200. Future Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25591841 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastases.Radiol Med. 2016 Jul;121(7):537-45. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0626-5. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Radiol Med. 2016. PMID: 27033474
-
Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.Cancer Sci. 2010 Jun;101(6):1471-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01532.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11. Cancer Sci. 2010. PMID: 20298252 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of bulky lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer: boosting versus debulking.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Jul 4;32(7):861-868. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003357. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35483738 Free PMC article.
-
Therapeutic effects of surgical debulking of metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer IIICr: a trial protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled study (KGOG1047/DEBULK trial).J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Sep;35(5):e57. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e57. Epub 2024 Jan 22. J Gynecol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38330380 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment Strategies Guided by [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and [18F]FDG-Positive Lymph Nodes.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;16(4):717. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040717. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38398108 Free PMC article.