Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;8(6):E424-30.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.37.

Why a second look might be worth it: immuno-modulatory therapies in the critically ill patient

Affiliations

Why a second look might be worth it: immuno-modulatory therapies in the critically ill patient

Benedikt H Siegler et al. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Sepsis and septic shock are associated with high mortality rates and remain a serious menace for the critically ill patient. Concurrent activation of pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways and an excessive cytokine release represent initial key features in the deregulation of the humoral and cellular antimicrobial defense. Research of the last decades addressed both the ebullient inflammation as well as the resulting long-term failure of the host immunity. While the reestablishment of an adequate immune-competence is still under investigation, many promising experimental trials to limit the inflammatory response during sepsis were challenged by missing beneficial effects in clinical studies. Nevertheless, due to advanced knowledge about the complex regulation of inflammatory mediators and their overlapping involvement in other potentially life-threatening diseases, further evaluation of these approaches in relevant subgroups could help to identify critically ill patients with potential benefit from anti-inflammatory therapies.

Keywords: Sepsis; inflammation; macrophage activation syndrome; recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006;34:344-53. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000194725.48928.3A - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, et al. Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1244-50. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000261890.41311.E9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1303-10. 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. St John RC, Dorinsky PM. Immunologic therapy for ARDS, septic shock, and multiple-organ failure. Chest 1993;103:932-43. 10.1378/chest.103.3.932 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources