Perinatal outcome in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in ART cycles
- PMID: 27294214
- PMCID: PMC4899761
Perinatal outcome in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in ART cycles
Abstract
Background: Despite of higher pregnancy rate after frozen embryo transfer (FET) which is accepted by the majority of researches, the safety of this method and its effect on neonatal outcome is still under debate.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate pregnancy and neonatal outcome of FET compare to fresh cycles.
Materials and methods: In this study,1134 patients using fresh ET and 285 women underwent FET were investigated regarding live birth as primary outcome and gestational age, birth weight, gender, multiple status, ectopic pregnancy, still birth and pregnancy loss as secondary outcomes.
Results: Our results showed that there is no difference between FET and fresh cycles regarding live birth (65.6% vs. 70.4% respectively). Ectopic pregnancy, still birth and abortion were similar in both groups. The mean gestational age was significantly lower among singletons in FET group compared to fresh cycles (p=0.047). Prematurity was significantly elevated among singleton infants in FET group (19.6%) in comparison to neonates born after fresh ET (12.8%) (p=0.037).
Conclusion: It seems that there is no major difference regarding perinatal outcome between fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Although, live birth is slightly increased in fresh cycles and prematurity was significantly increased among singleton infants in FET group.
Keywords: Fresh embryo transfer; Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; Perinatal outcome; Pregnancy outcome.
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest in this study.
Similar articles
-
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study.J Ovarian Res. 2018 Jul 16;11(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13048-018-0432-x. J Ovarian Res. 2018. PMID: 30012201 Free PMC article.
-
Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):556-567. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew358. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28130435 Clinical Trial.
-
Perinatal and maternal outcomes after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer cycles in women of advanced maternal age.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Feb;257:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.047. Epub 2020 Sep 30. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021. PMID: 33131929
-
Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2018 Feb;109(2):330-342.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.019. Epub 2018 Jan 11. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 29331236 Review.
-
Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis.Hum Reprod. 2019 Mar 1;34(3):491-505. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey388. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30689865
Cited by
-
Reduced live birth rates in frozen versus fresh single cleavage stage embryo transfer cycles: A cross -sectional study.Int J Reprod Biomed. 2020 Jul 22;18(7):491-500. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v13i7.7366. eCollection 2020 Jul. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2020. PMID: 32803114 Free PMC article.
-
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles among high responder women: A randomized, multi-center study.Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018 Jan;16(1):9-18. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018. PMID: 29675483 Free PMC article.
-
Alterations of miR-16, miR-let-7a and their target genes expression in human blastocysts following vitrification and re-vitrification.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Oct 9;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00842-w. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 34627262 Free PMC article.
-
The comparison of pregnancy outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer: A cross-sectional study.Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023 Aug 23;21(7):551-556. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i7.13891. eCollection 2023 Aug. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023. PMID: 37727398 Free PMC article.
-
Vitamin D in Reproductive Health Disorders: A Narrative Review Focusing on Infertility, Endometriosis, and Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 3;26(5):2256. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052256. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40076878 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:156–162. - PubMed
-
- Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:344–348. - PubMed
-
- Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:516–518. - PubMed
-
- Devroey P, Bourgain C, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and endometrial receptivity. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2004;15:84–90. - PubMed
-
- Bourgain C, Devroey P. The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:515–522. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources