Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Jun 9;8(6):358.
doi: 10.3390/nu8060358.

Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11-24 Year-Old

Jennifer Bradley  1   2 , Emma Simpson  3   4 , Ivan Poliakov  5 , John N S Matthews  6 , Patrick Olivier  7 , Ashley J Adamson  8   9 , Emma Foster  10   11
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11-24 Year-Old

Jennifer Bradley et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Online dietary assessment tools offer a convenient, low cost alternative to traditional dietary assessment methods such as weighed records and face-to-face interviewer-led 24-h recalls. INTAKE24 is an online multiple pass 24-h recall tool developed for use with 11-24 year-old. The aim of the study was to undertake a comparison of INTAKE24 (the test method) with interviewer-led multiple pass 24-h recalls (the comparison method) in 180 people aged 11-24 years. Each participant completed both an INTAKE24 24-h recall and an interviewer-led 24-h recall on the same day on four occasions over a one-month period. The daily energy and nutrient intakes reported in INTAKE24 were compared to those reported in the interviewer-led recall. Mean intakes reported using INTAKE24 were similar to the intakes reported in the interviewer-led recall for energy and macronutrients. INTAKE24 was found to underestimate energy intake by 1% on average compared to the interviewer-led recall with the limits of agreement ranging from minus 49% to plus 93%. Mean intakes of all macronutrients and micronutrients (except non-milk extrinsic sugars) were within 4% of the interviewer-led recall. Dietary assessment that utilises technology may offer a viable alternative and be more engaging than paper based methods, particularly for children and young adults.

Keywords: 24-h dietary recall; AMPM; INTAKE24; automated multiple-pass method; dietary assessment methods; interviewer-led 24-h dietary recall; online dietary assessment tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screen shots of INTAKE24; (A) User instructions for INTAKE24; (B) Food and drink entry interface.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Screen shots of INTAKE24; (A) User instructions for INTAKE24; (B) Food and drink entry interface.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of food portion estimation methods in INTAKE24.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow chart detailing participant flow through the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Livingstone M.B., Prentice A.M., Strain J.J., Coward W.A., Black A.E., Barker M.E., McKenna P.G., Whitehead R.G. Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health. BMJ. 1990;300:708–712. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6726.708. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stephen A.M., Mak T.N., Fitt E., Nicholson S., Roberts C., Sommerville J. Innovations in national nutrition surveys. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2013;72:77–88. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112002923. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carvalho M.A., Baranowski T., Foster E., Santos O., Cardoso B., Rito A., Pereira Miguel J. Validation of the Portuguese self-administered computerised 24-h dietary recall among second-, third- and fourth-grade children. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2015;28:666–674. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12280. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vereecken C.A., Covents M., Sichert-Hellert W., Alvira J.M., Le Donne C., De Henauw S., De Vriendt T., Phillipp M.K., Beghin L., Manios Y., et al. Development and evaluation of a self-administered computerized 24-h dietary recall method for adolescents in Europe. Int. J. Obes. 2008;32:26–34. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Foster E., Delve J., Simpson E., Panagio Breininger S. Comparison study: INTAKE24 vs. Interviewer Led Recall. [(accessed on 3 May 2016)]; Final Report. Available online: https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/INTAKE24%20Comparison%20stud....

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources