Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Jun;70(6):891-8.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-198906000-00002.

Position and motion of the human diaphragm during anesthesia-paralysis

Affiliations

Position and motion of the human diaphragm during anesthesia-paralysis

S Krayer et al. Anesthesiology. 1989 Jun.

Abstract

Regional motion of the human diaphragm was determined by high-speed, three-dimensional x-ray computed tomography. Six healthy volunteers were studied first while awake and breathing spontaneously and again while anesthetized-paralyzed and their lungs ventilated mechanically. Tidal volume (VT) and respiratory frequency were similar during both conditions. Three subjects were studied while they were supine and three while they were prone. During spontaneous breathing, movement of dependent diaphragm regions was greater than that of nondependent regions in four of six subjects. In five of the six subjects, dorsal diaphragm movement exceeded ventral movement regardless of body position. The volume displaced by the diaphragm (delta Vdi) was similar to VT in supine subjects but tended to be less than VT in prone subjects. After induction of anesthesia-paralysis, the end-expiratory position of the diaphragm did not change consistently in supine subjects, whereas a consistent cephalad volume shift occurred in prone subjects. During anesthesia-paralysis and mechanical ventilation, delta Vdi was reduced to approximately 50% of VT in both body positions. In the supine position, the pattern of diaphragm motion during mechanical inflation was nearly uniform. By contrast, in the prone position, the motion was nonuniform, with most motion occurring in the dorsal (nondependent) regions. It is concluded that the dominant influence on diaphragm motion may be some anatomical difference between the crural and costal diaphragm regions rather than the abdominal hydrostatic pressure gradient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources