Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Mar;36(2):220-226.
doi: 10.1111/dar.12412. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

Comparison of cannabinoids in hair with self-reported cannabis consumption in heavy, light and non-cannabis users

Michelle Taylor  1   2 , Rosie Lees  2 , Graeme Henderson  3 , Anne Lingford-Hughes  4 , John Macleod  2 , John Sullivan  5 , Matthew Hickman  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of cannabinoids in hair with self-reported cannabis consumption in heavy, light and non-cannabis users

Michelle Taylor et al. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Biological tests of drug use can be used to inform clinical and legal decisions and hold potential to provide evidence for epidemiological studies where self-reported behaviour may be unavailable or unreliable. We test whether hair can be considered as a reliable marker of cannabis exposure.

Methods: Hair samples were collected from 136 subjects who were self-reported heavy, light or non-users of cannabis and tested using GC-MS/MS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for five cannabinoids (tetrahydrocannabinol [THC], THC-OH, THC-COOH, cannabinol and cannabidiol). Samples also were segmented in 1 cm sections representing 1 month exposure and the correlation between amount of cannabinoid detected and self-reported cannabis consumption tested.

Results: All five cannabinoids were detected. Seventy-seven percent of heavy users, 39% of light users and 0% of non-users tested positive for THC. The sensitivity of detection of THC was 0.77 (0.56-0.91) comparing heavy cannabis smokers with light and non-users, whereas the sensitivity of other cannabinoids generally was considerably lower. The positive and negative predictive value of detection of THC were 0.57 (0.39-0.74) and 0.91 (0.82-0.97), respectively. A correlation of 0.52 (P < 0.001) was observed between self-reported monthly cannabis use and THC.

Discussion: Hair analysis can be used as a qualitative indicator of heavy (daily or near daily) cannabis consumption within the past 3 months. However, this approach is unable to reliably detect light cannabis consumption or determine the quantity of cannabis used by the individual. [Taylor M, Lees R, Henderson G, Lingford-Hughes A, Macleod J, Sullivan J, Hickman M. Comparison of cannabinoids in hair with self-reported cannabis consumption in heavy, light and non-cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;36:220-226].

Keywords: cannabinoid; cannabis; hair testing; sensitivity; specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box and Whisker plot showing amount of cannabinoids detected in the hair of non‐users, light cannabis users and heavy cannabis users, where each cannabinoid is measured in ng/mg. Non‐users were not included in this plot as none of these individuals had any of the cannabinoids detected in their hair.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Macleod J, Hickman M, Smith GD. Reporting bias and self‐reported drug use. Addiction 2005;100:562–3. - PubMed
    1. Anthony J, Neumark Y, Van Etten M. Do I do what I say? A perspective on self‐report methods in Drug Dependence Epidemiology In: Stone A, ed. The science of self‐report: implication for research and practise. London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 2000:175–99.
    1. Wolff K, Farrell M, Marsden J, et al A review of biological indicators of illicit drug use, practical considerations and clinical usefulness. Addiction 1999;94:1279–98. - PubMed
    1. Dolan K, Rouen D, Kimber J. An overview of the use of urine, hair, sweat and saliva to detect drug use. Drug and Alcohol Rev 2004;23:213–7. - PubMed
    1. Lowe RH, Abraham TT, Darwin WD, Herning R, Cadet JL, Huestis MA. Extended urinary Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol excretion in chronic cannabis users precludes use as a biomarker of new drug exposure. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009;105:24–32. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types