Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2013 Oct-Dec;3(4):26-30.
doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.127.

Ipsilateral Fracture Shaft Femur with Neglected Dislocation of Prosthesis: A Case Report

Affiliations
Case Reports

Ipsilateral Fracture Shaft Femur with Neglected Dislocation of Prosthesis: A Case Report

Mantu Jain et al. J Orthop Case Rep. 2013 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Neglected hip dislocation is rare in today's world and after prosthesis replacement even rarer finding. However such patients may not report to surgeons until they develop secondary complications. Management of such patient's is a challenge to the treating surgeon and need to be tailored suiting to patient's demands, expectations and constraints of financial resources. We did not find a similar case in the electronic and print media and therefore report this case which was innovatively managed.

Case report: A 60 year farmer presented with fracture shaft femur and ipsilateral dislocation prosthesis of right hip. He had a hemiarthroplasty done for fracture neck of femur in the past but used to walk with a lurch since he started to ambulate after discharge. However he was satisfied despite "some problems" which had caused shortening of his limb. The patient was informed of the various treatment options and their possible complications. He expressed his inability to afford a Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) at any stage and consented for other options discussed with him. The patient was positioned supine and adductor tenotomy done. Next he was positioned laterally and the fracture was fixed with heavy duty broad dynamic compression plate and screws. The wound was temporarily closed. Now through the previous scar via posterior approach the hip was exposed. The prosthesis was found to be firmly fixed to the proximal femur. The acetabulum was cleared with fibrous tissue. All attempts the prosthesis to relocate the prosthesis failed after several attempts and it was best decided to leave alone. Post operatively period was uneventful. At follow up he refused for any further manoeuvre in future inform of heavy traction and attempts to reduce the same. At one year when he was walking unaided and his X-rays showed that fracture had well united his SF-36 score was PCS - 49.6 and MCS - 51.9.

Conclusion: Ipsilateral shaft femur fracture in chronically dislocated prosthesis, done for fracture neck of femur is a rare clinical entity. Increased stress transfers due to dislocation compounded with osteoporosis makes the shaft vulnerable to fracture even with low velocity injury as in our case. Though fixation of fracture shaft femur is clear and straightforward; management of neglected prosthesis dislocation have to be guided by patient's level of expectations and subjective contentment to adaptation to the altered hip state which influence the overall functional outcome.

Keywords: Neglected dislocation; hip arthroplasty; ipsilateral femoral fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Nil

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
clinical picture of patient showing typical deformity
Figure 2
Figure 2
X ray showing ipsilateral shaft fracture and dislocated prosthesis
Figure 3a
Figure 3a
X ray showing fracture neck of femur Lt side,
Figure 3b
Figure 3b
post operative roentogram showing prosthesis contained in acetabulum
Figure 4
Figure 4
follow up roentogram showing dislocated prosthesis
Figure 5
Figure 5
Final ray after fixation of fracture. Prosthesis still remains out of socket
Figure 6a, 6b
Figure 6a, 6b
Clinical picture of patient at follow up showing unaided weight bearing
Figure 7
Figure 7
Final X ray showing fracture showing union
None

Similar articles

References

    1. Blewitt N, Mortimore S. Outcome of dislocation after hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of the femur. Injury. 1992;23:320–322. - PubMed
    1. Paton RW, Hirst P. Hemiarthroplasty of the hip and dislocation. Injury. 1989;20:167–169. - PubMed
    1. Unwin AJ, Thomas M. Dislocation after hemiarthroplasty of the hip: a comparison of the dislocation rate after posterior and lateral approaches to the hip. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:327329. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nozawa M, Nishiura T, Maezawa K, Matsuda K, Morio H. Dislocation after Hemiarthroplasty due to Insufficiency Fracture of the Superior Acetabulum: A Case Report. Case Reports in Medicine. Volume 2009 Article ID 257136, 3 pages doi: 10.1155/2009/257136. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips TW. The Bateman bipolar femoral head replacement. A fluoroscopic study of movement over a four-year period. J BoneJoint Surg Br. 1987;69:761–764. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources