Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Jun;209(6):736-42.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198906000-00011.

Blood conservation in cardiac surgery. Preliminary results with an institutional commitment

Affiliations

Blood conservation in cardiac surgery. Preliminary results with an institutional commitment

G S Tyson et al. Ann Surg. 1989 Jun.

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of blood conservation in cardiac surgery, use of blood products was analyzed in patients undergoing CABG before and after implementation of blood conservation techniques. Age, sex, coronary anatomy, ejection fraction, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and the preoperative hematocrit, platelet count, and clotting studies were similar in both groups. Methods of blood conservation included autologous transfusion of blood withdrawn before bypass, autotransfusion of shed mediastinal blood, strict protocols for transfusion, and acceptance of normovolemic anemia. With blood conservation, 25.5% of patients received no transfusions and 54.9% received blood only. Significant reductions (p less than 0.001) were achieved in the transfusion of blood from 6.8 +/- 2.4 to 2.3 +/- 2.6 units per patient and of plasma from 2.5 +/- 2.2 to 0.6 +/- 2.0 units per patient. Reductions in the use of platelets and cryoprecipitate were substantial, although not significant. Total donor exposure was reduced significantly from 13.1 +/- 7.3 to 4.3 +/- 6.7 donors per patient. The postoperative hematocrit was significantly lower and remained so at discharge. However, 30 days later there was no difference. This reduction in transfusion requirements decreased costs and donor exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Surg. 1967 Apr;94(4):567-70 - PubMed
    1. Surg Forum. 1960;10:605-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1974 Jul;18(1):72-80 - PubMed
    1. Bibl Haematol. 1975;(41):16-33 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978 Apr;75(4):632-41 - PubMed