Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Summer;16(2):176-9.

Do Not Resuscitate, Anesthesia, and Perioperative Care: A Not So Clear Order

William D Sumrall  1 , Elizabeth Mahanna  2 , Vivek Sabharwal  3 , Thomas Marshall  1
Affiliations
Review

Do Not Resuscitate, Anesthesia, and Perioperative Care: A Not So Clear Order

William D Sumrall et al. Ochsner J. 2016 Summer.

Abstract

Background: Advance directives guide healthcare providers to listen to and respect patients' wishes regarding their right to die in circumstances when cardiopulmonary resuscitation is required, and hospitals accredited by The Joint Commission are required to have a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) policy in place. However, when surgery and anesthesia are necessary for the care of the patient with a DNR order, this advance directive can create ethical dilemmas specifically involving patient autonomy and the physician's responsibility to do no harm.

Methods: This paper discusses the ethical considerations regarding perioperative DNR orders and provides guidance on how to handle situations that may arise in the conduct of perioperative care.

Results: Because of the potential conflicts between ethical care and the restrictions of DNR orders, it is critically important to discuss the medical and ethical issues surrounding this clinical scenario with the patient or surrogate prior to any surgical intervention. However, many anesthesiologists do not adequately address this ethical dilemma prior to the procedure.

Conclusion: Practitioners are advised to first consider what is best for the patient and, when in doubt, to communicate with patients or surrogates and with colleagues to arrive at the most appropriate care plan. If irreconcilable conflicts arise, consultation with the institution's bioethics committee, if available, is beneficial to help reach a resolution.

Keywords: Ethics; ethics consultation; perioperative care; resuscitation orders.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Koch KA. Patient Self-Determination Act. J Fla Med Assoc. 1992. April; 79 4: 240- 243. - PubMed
    1. Scott TH, Gavrin JR. Palliative surgery in the do-not-resuscitate patient: ethics and practical suggestions for management. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012. March; 30 1: 1- 12. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2012.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nurok M, Green DS, Chisholm MF, Fins JJ, Liguori GA. Anesthesiologists' familiarity with the ASA and ACS guidelines on advance directives in the perioperative setting. J Clin Anesth. 2014. May; 26 3: 174- 176. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.11.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ewanchuk M, Brindley PG. Perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders—doing ‘nothing' when ‘something' can be done. Crit Care. 2006; 10 4: 219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clemency MV, Thompson NJ. Do not resuscitate orders in the perioperative period: patient perspectives. Anesth Analg. 1997. April; 84 4: 859- 864. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources