Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0156816.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156816. eCollection 2016.

Identifying Markers of Dignity-Conserving Care in Long-Term Care: A Modified Delphi Study

Affiliations

Identifying Markers of Dignity-Conserving Care in Long-Term Care: A Modified Delphi Study

Genevieve N Thompson et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Ensuring that people living in nursing homes (NHs) are afforded with dignity in their daily lives is an essential and humane concern. Promoting dignity-conserving care is fundamentally important. By nature, however, this care is all-encompassing and holistic, and from current knowledge it is challenging to create explicit strategies for measuring dignity-conserving care. In practice the majority of current NH indicators of quality care are derived from information that is routinely collected on NH residents using the RAI-Minimum Data Set (MDS). In this regard, issues that are more tangible to resident dignity such as being treated with respect, compassion, and having opportunities to engage with others are not adequately captured in current NH quality of care indicators. An initial set of markers was created by conducting an integrative literature review of existing markers and indicators of dignity in the NH setting. A modified Delphi process was used to prioritize essential dignity-conserving care markers for use by NH providers, based on factors such as the importance to fostering a culture of dignity, the impact it may have on the residents, and how achievable it is in practice. Through this consensus building technique, we were able to develop a comprehensive set of markers that capture the range and diversity of important dignity-conserving care strategies for use in NHs. The final 10 markers were judged as having high face validity by experts in the field and have explicit implications for enhancing the provision of daily dignified care to NH residents. These markers make an important addition to the traditional quality indicators used in the NH setting and as such, bridge an important gap in addressing the psychosocial and the less easily quantified needs of NH residents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McClement SE, Chochinov HM, Hack TF, Kristjanson LJ, Harlos M. Dignity-conserving care: application of research findings to practice. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004;10(4):173–179. - PubMed
    1. Chochinov HM. Dignity-conserving care—a new model for palliative care: helping the patient feel valued. JAMA. 2002;287(17):2253–2260. - PubMed
    1. Coventry ML. Care with dignity: a concept analysis. J Gerontol Nurs. 2006;32(5):42–48. - PubMed
    1. Magee H, Parsons S, Askham J. Measuring dignity in care for older people. a research report for help the aged. 2008. Available from: http://www.ageuk.org.uk
    1. Lin Y-, Watson R, Tsai Y-. Dignity in care in the clinical setting: A narrative review. Nurs Ethics 2013;20(2):168–177. 10.1177/0969733012458609 - DOI - PubMed