Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;27(6):489-497.
doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15122.

Perception of Small Frequency Differences in Children with Auditory Processing Disorder or Specific Language Impairment

Perception of Small Frequency Differences in Children with Auditory Processing Disorder or Specific Language Impairment

Christine Rota-Donahue et al. J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Frequency discrimination is often impaired in children developing language atypically. However, findings in the detection of small frequency changes in these children are conflicting. Previous studies on children's auditory perceptual abilities usually involved establishing differential sensitivity thresholds in sample populations who were not tested for auditory deficits. To date, there are no data comparing suprathreshold frequency discrimination ability in children tested for both auditory processing and language skills.

Purpose: : This study examined the perception of small frequency differences (∆ƒ) in children with auditory processing disorder (APD) and/or specific language impairment (SLI). The aim was to determine whether children with APD and children with SLI showed differences in their behavioral responses to frequency changes. Results were expected to identify different degrees of impairment and shed some light on the auditory perceptual overlap between pediatric APD and SLI.

Research design: An experimental group design using a two-alternative forced-choice procedure was used to determine frequency discrimination ability for three magnitudes of ∆ƒ from the 1000-Hz base frequency.

Study sample: Thirty children between 10 years of age and 12 years, 11 months of age: 17 children with APD and/or SLI, and 13 typically developing (TD) peers participated. The clinical groups included four children with APD only, four children with SLI only, and nine children with both APD and SLI.

Data collection and analysis: Behavioral data collected using headphone delivery were analyzed using the sensitivity index d', calculated for three ∆ƒ was 2%, 5%, and 15% of the base frequency or 20, 50, and 150 Hz. Correlations between the dependent variable d' and the independent variables measuring auditory processing and language skills were also obtained. A stepwise regression analysis was then performed.

Results: TD children and children with APD and/or SLI differed in the detection of small-tone ∆ƒ. In addition, APD or SLI status affected behavioral results differently. Comparisons between auditory processing test scores or language test scores and the sensitivity index d' showed different strengths of correlation based on the magnitudes of the ∆ƒ. Auditory processing scores showed stronger correlation to the sensitivity index d' for the small ∆ƒ, while language scores showed stronger correlation to the sensitivity index d' for the large ∆ƒ.

Conclusion: Although children with APD and/or SLI have difficulty with behavioral frequency discrimination, this difficulty may stem from two different levels: a basic auditory level for children with APD and a higher language processing level for children with SLI; the frequency discrimination performance seemed to be affected by the labeling demands of the same versus different frequency discrimination task for the children with SLI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
R2 change for the three magnitudes of Δf: small, medium, and large, when either the CELF (in blue) or the SCAN (in red) is added to the regression model.

References

    1. Ahmmed A, Parker D, Adams C, Newton V. Auditory temporal resolution in children with specific language impairment. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 2006;14(2):79–96.
    1. American Academy of Audiology (AAA) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of Children and Adults with Central Auditory Processing Disorder. Clinical Practice Guidelines. 2010:1–51.
    1. American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) (Central) auditory processing disorders. 2005. pp. 1–20. (Technical Report).
    1. Banai K, Ahissar M. Poor frequency discrimination probes dyslexics with particularly impaired working memory. Audiol Neurootol. 2004;9(6):328–340. - PubMed
    1. Bellis TJ. When the Brain Can’t Hear: Unraveling the Mystery of Auditory Processing Disorder. New York, NY: Atria Books; 2003.