Impact of the Banff 2013 classification on the diagnosis of suspicious versus conclusive late antibody-mediated rejection in allografts without acute dysfunction

Abstract

Background: The Banff classification is used worldwide to characterize pathological findings in renal allograft biopsies. During the 11th Banff meeting, relevant changes were introduced in the diagnostic criteria for Category 2 antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Here, we assess the effect of these changes on the diagnosis of late chronic ABMR.

Methods: Seventy-three indication renal graft biopsies (chronic dysfunction, proteinuria and/or the presence of de novo donor-specific antibodies) from 68 kidney transplant recipients initially classified following the Banff 2009 criteria were reviewed and reclassified as per the new Banff 2013 criteria.

Results: The diagnostic category changed in 18% of the study biopsies with Banff 2013. The reclassification mainly involved Category 2 cases, from which 23.5% of the biopsies from older patients with worse graft function were overlooked by Banff 2009. ABMR was ruled out in 13% of cases under the Banff 2009 criteria. A significant number of the study samples were conclusively diagnosed as ABMR (40% as per Banff 2009 and 74% as per Banff 2013; P = 0.006), because of the inclusion of microvascular inflammation and the acceptance of some ultrastructural diagnostic criteria. However, when following the criteria of the new classification, samples with histological signs of chronic ABMR, in which human leucocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies are not detected or ultrastructural studies are not performed, may be inadequately characterized.

Conclusions: The Banff 2013 classification helps in making a diagnosis of late ABMR, identifying cases, decreasing the percentage of suspected ABMR and making more conclusive diagnoses.

Keywords: Banff classification; antibody-mediated rejection; glomerulitis; microinflammation.