Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Jun 16;5(6):e002846.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002846.

Long-Term Survival of Individuals Born With Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Long-Term Survival of Individuals Born With Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kate E Best et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Estimates of long-term survival are required to adequately assess the variety of health and social services required by those with congenital heart disease (CHD) throughout their lives.

Methods and results: Medline, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to June 2015 using MeSH headings and keywords. Population-based studies that ascertained all persons born with CHD within a predefined area and reported survival estimates at ≥5 years were included. Unadjusted survival estimates for each CHD subtype at ages 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, and so forth were extracted. Pooled survival estimates for each age were calculated using meta-analyses. Metaregression was performed to examine the impact of study period on survival. Of 7840 identified articles, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Among those with CHD, pooled 1-year survival was 87.0% (95% CI 82.1-91.2), pooled 5-year survival was 85.4% (95% CI 79.4-90.5), and pooled 10-year survival was 81.4% (95% CI 73.8-87.9). There was significant heterogeneity of survival estimates among articles (P<0.001 for 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival). A more recent study period was significantly associated with greater survival at ages 1 year (P=0.047), 5 years (P=0.013), and 10 years (P=0.046). Survival varied by CHD subtype, with 5-year survival being greatest for those with ventricular septal defect (96.3%, 95% CI 93.7-98.2) and lowest for those with hypoplastic left heart (12.5%, 95% CI 0.0-41.4).

Conclusions: Among persons with CHD, the mortality rate is greatest during the first year of life; however, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that survival decreases gradually after infancy and into adulthood.

Keywords: congenital; heart defects; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses diagram for the flow of articles through the review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot for all congenital heart disease at ages 1, 5, and 10 years.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bubble plot of survival estimates for all congenital heart disease at ages 1 to 25 years.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bubble plots showing the association between study period and survival for all congenital heart disease. A, 1‐year survival. B, 5‐year survival. C, 10‐year survival.

References

    1. Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1890–1900. - PubMed
    1. Reller MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle‐Colarusso T, Mahle WT, Correa A. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998–2005. J Pediatr. 2008;153:807–813. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. Congenital heart defects in Europe: prevalence and perinatal mortality, 2000 to 2005. Circulation. 2011;123:841–849. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control Prevention . Racial differences by gestational age in neonatal deaths attributable to congenital heart defects—United States, 2003–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:1208. - PubMed
    1. Oster ME, Lee KA, Honein MA, Riehle‐Colarusso T, Shin M, Correa A. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1502–e1508. - PMC - PubMed