Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;18(8):74.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0750-9.

Bioresorbable Stents in PCI

Affiliations
Review

Bioresorbable Stents in PCI

Daniel Lindholm et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

The evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention has been considerable. Coronary stents were introduced to avoid vessel recoil and reduce acute and late vessel complications. Later, drug-eluting stents were developed to decrease the neointimal hyperplasia associated with bare metal stents in order to reduce restenosis. However, very late stent thrombosis remains problematic, and the permanent presence of a metal stent could be associated with local inflammation and impaired vascular physiology. Thus, bioresorbable stents have been developed, to prevent recoil initially when this risk is the highest, with subsequent degradation over time, to avoid long-term complications of the presence of stents in the coronary vasculature. Here, we review the current status of bioresorbable stents in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with focus on the platforms that have been studied the most: ABSORB, DESolve, and DREAMS. In terms of clinical outcomes, bioresorbable stents have not yet shown superiority compared with current generation drug-eluting stents, but rather a signal of increased stent thrombosis. Further development and longer-term studies are needed before the routine implementation of bioresorbable stents in clinical practice.

Keywords: Bioresorbable stents; Coronary artery disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):31-9 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1987 Mar 19;316(12):701-6 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2012 Jun 12;125(23):2873-91 - PubMed
    1. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):89-99 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 3;65(8):791-801 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources