Accurate cloud-based smart IMT measurement, its validation and stroke risk stratification in carotid ultrasound: A web-based point-of-care tool for multicenter clinical trial
- PMID: 27318571
- DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.010
Accurate cloud-based smart IMT measurement, its validation and stroke risk stratification in carotid ultrasound: A web-based point-of-care tool for multicenter clinical trial
Abstract
This study presents AtheroCloud™ - a novel cloud-based smart carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) measurement tool using B-mode ultrasound for stroke/cardiovascular risk assessment and its stratification. This is an anytime-anywhere clinical tool for routine screening and multi-center clinical trials. In this pilot study, the physician can upload ultrasound scans in one of the following formats (DICOM, JPEG, BMP, PNG, GIF or TIFF) directly into the proprietary cloud of AtheroPoint from the local server of the physician's office. They can then run the intelligent and automated AtheroCloud™ cIMT measurements in point-of-care settings in less than five seconds per image, while saving the vascular reports in the cloud. We statistically benchmark AtheroCloud™ cIMT readings against sonographer (a registered vascular technologist) readings and manual measurements derived from the tracings of the radiologist. One hundred patients (75 M/25 F, mean age: 68±11 years), IRB approved, Toho University, Japan, consisted of Left/Right common carotid artery (CCA) artery (200 ultrasound scans), (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) were collected using a 7.5MHz transducer. The measured cIMTs for L/R carotid were as follows (in mm): (i) AtheroCloud™ (0.87±0.20, 0.77±0.20); (ii) sonographer (0.97±0.26, 0.89±0.29) and (iii) manual (0.90±0.20, 0.79±0.20), respectively. The coefficient of correlation (CC) between sonographer and manual for L/R cIMT was 0.74 (P<0.0001) and 0.65 (P<0.0001), while, between AtheroCloud™ and manual was 0.96 (P<0.0001) and 0.97 (P<0.0001), respectively. We observed that 91.15% of the population in AtheroCloud™ had a mean cIMT error less than 0.11mm compared to sonographer's 68.31%. The area under curve for receiving operating characteristics was 0.99 for AtheroCloud™ against 0.81 for sonographer. Our Framingham Risk Score stratified the population into three bins as follows: 39% in low-risk, 70.66% in medium-risk and 10.66% in high-risk bins. Statistical tests were performed to demonstrate consistency, reliability and accuracy of the results. The proposed AtheroCloud™ system is completely reliable, automated, fast (3-5 seconds depending upon the image size having an internet speed of 180Mbps), accurate, and an intelligent, web-based clinical tool for multi-center clinical trials and routine telemedicine clinical care.
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Automated; Carotid; Cloud; Pharmaceutical trails; Precision of merit; ROC; Routine; Stroke; Telemedicine; Ultrasound; Web-based; cIMT; reliable.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Web-based accurate measurements of carotid lumen diameter and stenosis severity: An ultrasound-based clinical tool for stroke risk assessment during multicenter clinical trials.Comput Biol Med. 2017 Dec 1;91:306-317. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Oct 23. Comput Biol Med. 2017. PMID: 29107894
-
Improved correlation between carotid and coronary atherosclerosis SYNTAX score using automated ultrasound carotid bulb plaque IMT measurement.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 May;41(5):1247-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.12.024. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015. PMID: 25638311
-
Deep learning strategy for accurate carotid intima-media thickness measurement: An ultrasound study on Japanese diabetic cohort.Comput Biol Med. 2018 Jul 1;98:100-117. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 12. Comput Biol Med. 2018. PMID: 29778925
-
Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Oct;7(10):1025-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Jul 16. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014. PMID: 25051948 Review.
-
Carotid intima-media thickness measurement in cardiovascular screening programmes.Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283312ece. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 19752735 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of carotid image-based phenotypes on cardiovascular risk calculator: AECRS1.0.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019 Jul;57(7):1553-1566. doi: 10.1007/s11517-019-01975-2. Epub 2019 Apr 15. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019. PMID: 30989577
-
Cardiovascular/stroke risk predictive calculators: a comparison between statistical and machine learning models.Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Aug;10(4):919-938. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2020.01.07. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020. PMID: 32968651 Free PMC article.
-
Attention-Enabled Ensemble Deep Learning Models and Their Validation for Depression Detection: A Domain Adoption Paradigm.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;13(12):2092. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122092. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37370987 Free PMC article.
-
Parameter Measurement of Live Animals Based on the Mirror of Multiview Point Cloud.Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Oct 29;2021:9528787. doi: 10.1155/2021/9528787. eCollection 2021. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34745254 Free PMC article.
-
Inter-Variability Study of COVLIAS 1.0: Hybrid Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Lung Segmentation in Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 1;11(11):2025. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112025. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34829372 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical