Sustained clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-LBBB patients with prolonged PR-interval: MADIT-CRT long-term follow-up
- PMID: 27318807
- DOI: 10.1007/s00392-016-1003-z
Sustained clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-LBBB patients with prolonged PR-interval: MADIT-CRT long-term follow-up
Abstract
Objective: In MADIT-CRT, patients with non-LBBB (right bundle branch block or nonspecific ventricular conduction delay) and a prolonged PR-interval derived significant clinical benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) compared to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)-only. We aimed to study the long-term outcome of non-LBBB patients by baseline PR-interval with CRT-D versus ICD-only.
Methods: Non-LBBB patients (n = 534) were dichotomized based on baseline PR-interval: normal PR (PR < 230 ms), and markedly prolonged PR (PR ≥ 230 ms). The primary end point was heart failure (HF) or death. Secondary end points were HF only and all-cause death.
Results: In patients with a prolonged PR-interval, CRT-D treatment related to a 67 % significant reduction in the risk of HF/death (HR = 0.33, 95 % CI 0.16-0.69, p = 0.003), 69 % decrease in HF (HR = 0.31, 95 % CI 0.14-0.68, p = 0.003), and 76 % reduction in the risk of death (HR = 0.24, 95 % CI 0.07-0.80, p = 0.020) compared to ICD-only (median follow-up 5.8 years). In normal PR-interval patients, CRT-D therapy was associated with a trend towards increased risk of HF/death (HR = 1.49, 95 % CI 0.98-2.25, p = 0.061), and significantly increased mortality (HR = 2.27, 95 % CI 1.16-4.44, p = 0.014). Significant statistical interaction with the PR-interval was demonstrated for all end points. Results were consistent for QRS 130-150 ms and QRS > 150 ms.
Conclusion: In MADIT-CRT, non-LBBB patients with a prolonged PR-interval derive sustained long-term clinical benefit with reductions in heart failure or death from CRT-D implantation, compared to an ICD-only. Our findings support implantation of CRT-D in non-LBBB patients with prolonged PR-interval irrespective of baseline QRS duration.
Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; First-degree AV block; Left bundle branch block; MADIT-CRT; Non-left bundle branch block; PR-interval.
Similar articles
-
PR interval identifies clinical response in patients with non-left bundle branch block: a Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy substudy.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;7(4):645-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001299. Epub 2014 Jun 24. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 24963007 Clinical Trial.
-
Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 29;4(7):e002013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002013. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015. PMID: 26124205 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Relation of QRS Duration to Clinical Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients Without Left Bundle Branch Block: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Substudy.Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002667. Circ Heart Fail. 2016. PMID: 26823498
-
Does Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Benefit Patients with Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Prolonged QRS Patterns?Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Oct 24;19(12):125. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0929-8. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017. PMID: 29064041 Review.
-
Left bundle branch area pacing in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug;35(8):1536-1547. doi: 10.1111/jce.16304. Epub 2024 May 29. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 38812213
Cited by
-
Value of frontal QRS axis for risk stratification of individuals with prolonged PR interval.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2023 Jul;28(4):e13066. doi: 10.1111/anec.13066. Epub 2023 May 27. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2023. PMID: 37243938 Free PMC article.
-
Atrioventricular Conduction Delay Predicts Impaired Exercise Capacity in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Med Sci Monit. 2017 Aug 18;23:3989-3995. doi: 10.12659/msm.902908. Med Sci Monit. 2017. PMID: 28819094 Free PMC article.
-
ICD lead type and RV lead position in CRT-D recipients.Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Dec;107(12):1122-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1286-3. Epub 2018 May 24. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29797055
-
Echocardiographic Evaluation of His Bundle Pacing in Patients with Prolonged PR Intervals.Cardiol Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 16;7(2):69-78. doi: 10.26502/fccm.92920310. Cardiol Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37168252 Free PMC article.
-
The Atrioventricular Coupling in Heart Failure: Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Aspects.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 14;25(5):169. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2505169. eCollection 2024 May. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39076484 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous