Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a pilot study of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy
- PMID: 27320010
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2016.06.001
Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a pilot study of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy
Abstract
Background: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is increasingly used prophylactically following surgery despite limited evidence of clinical or cost-effectiveness.
Objective: To evaluate whether NPWT is cost-effective compared to standard care, for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) in obese women undergoing elective caesarean section, and inform development of a larger trial.
Methods: An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a pilot randomised controlled trial at one Australian hospital, in which women were randomised to NPWT (n = 44) or standard care (n = 43). A public health care provider perspective and time horizon to four weeks post-discharge was adopted. Cost-effectiveness assessment was based on incremental cost per SSI prevented and per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
Results: Patients receiving NPWT each received health care costing AU$5887 (±1038) and reported 0.069 (±0.010) QALYs compared to AU$5754 (±1484) and 0.066 (±0.010) QALYs for patients receiving standard care. NPWT may be slightly more costly and more effective than standard care, with estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of AU$1347 (95%CI dominant- $41,873) per SSI prevented and AU$42,340 (95%CI dominant- $884,019) per QALY gained. However, there was considerable uncertainty around these estimates.
Conclusions: NPWT may be cost-effective in the prophylactic treatment of surgical wounds following elective caesarean section in obese women. Larger trials could clarify the cost-effectiveness of NPWT as a prophylactic treatment for SSI. Sensitive capture of QALYs and cost offsets will be important given the high level of uncertainty around the point estimate cost-effectiveness ratio which was close to conventional thresholds.
Australian and new zealand trial registration number: ACTRN12612000171819.
Keywords: Caesarean section; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Negative pressure wound therapy; Surgical site infection; Wounds.
Copyright © 2016 Tissue Viability Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care after caesarean section in obese women: a trial-based economic evaluation.BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):619-627. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15573. Epub 2018 Dec 29. BJOG. 2019. PMID: 30507022 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy in preventing surgical site infection among obese women giving birth by caesarean section: An economic evaluation (DRESSING trial).Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Oct;63(5):673-680. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13677. Epub 2023 May 18. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023. PMID: 37200473 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-utility analysis of negative pressure wound therapy in high-risk cesarean section wounds.J Surg Res. 2015 May 15;195(2):612-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 13. J Surg Res. 2015. PMID: 25796106
-
Effect of negative-pressure wound therapy on wound complications in obese women after caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(2):196-207. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16963. Epub 2021 Nov 8. BJOG. 2022. PMID: 34622545
-
Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials Evaluating a Prophylactic Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System for the Prevention of Surgical Site Complications.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Oct;18(7):810-819. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.156. Epub 2017 Sep 8. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017. PMID: 28885895 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions in General and Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):e183467. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3467. Epub 2018 Nov 21. JAMA Surg. 2018. PMID: 30267040 Free PMC article.
-
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 1;5(5):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 15;6:CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub6. PMID: 32356396 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after cesarean is associated with reduced risk of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):200-210.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Sep 23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 28951263 Free PMC article.
-
Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL-2): protocol for a randomized clinical trial.BJS Open. 2024 Jul 2;8(4):zrae081. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae081. BJS Open. 2024. PMID: 39178168 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Closed-incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Abdominal Site Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Oct 9;11(10):e5326. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005326. eCollection 2023 Oct. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023. PMID: 37817928 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical