Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jun;64(6):1293-8.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.14132.

Cognitive and Neural Effects of Vision-Based Speed-of-Processing Training in Older Adults with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study

Feng Lin  1   2 , Kathi L Heffner  2 , Ping Ren  1 , Madalina E Tivarus  3 , Judith Brasch  1 , Ding-Geng Chen  1   4 , Mark Mapstone  5 , Anton P Porsteinsson  2 , Duje Tadin  6   7   8
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cognitive and Neural Effects of Vision-Based Speed-of-Processing Training in Older Adults with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study

Feng Lin et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the cognitive and neural effects of vision-based speed-of-processing (VSOP) training in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and contrast those effects with an active control (mental leisure activities (MLA)).

Design: Randomized single-blind controlled pilot trial.

Setting: Academic medical center.

Participants: Individuals with aMCI (N = 21).

Intervention: Six-week computerized VSOP training.

Measurements: Multiple cognitive processing measures, instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and two resting state neural networks regulating cognitive processing: central executive network (CEN) and default mode network (DMN).

Results: VSOP training led to significantly greater improvements in trained (processing speed and attention: F1,19 = 6.61, partial η(2) = 0.26, P = .02) and untrained (working memory: F1,19 = 7.33, partial η(2) = 0.28, P = .01; IADLs: F1,19 = 5.16, partial η(2) = 0.21, P = .03) cognitive domains than MLA and protective maintenance in DMN (F1, 9 = 14.63, partial η(2) = 0.62, P = .004). VSOP training, but not MLA, resulted in a significant improvement in CEN connectivity (Z = -2.37, P = .02).

Conclusion: Target and transfer effects of VSOP training were identified, and links between VSOP training and two neural networks associated with aMCI were found. These findings highlight the potential of VSOP training to slow cognitive decline in individuals with aMCI. Further delineation of mechanisms underlying VSOP-induced plasticity is necessary to understand in which populations and under what conditions such training may be most effective.

Keywords: central executive network; default mode network; mild cognitive impairment; speed of processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The editor in chief has reviewed the conflict of interest checklist provided by the authors and has determined that the authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of VSOP training and MLA control training on a range of cognitive and neural domains. A. Effects of training on UFOV, the trained domain for VSOP training; B. Effects of training on transfer domains: working memory, IADL, verbal fluency, and cognitive control; C. Effects of training on neural domains: resting state neural connectivity for CEN and DMN; inserts show horizontal brain slices that include key ROIs for each network (IFG = inferior frontal gyrus, ACC = anterior cingulate cortex, PCC = posterior cingulate cortex). Note. formula image Higher scores indicated better outcome; formula image Lower scores indicated better outcome. Within-group (Baseline vs. Post-training) comparison: * p < .05, ** p < .01. Group (VSOP vs. MLA) by time (Baseline vs. Post-training) comparison: × p < .05.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease:Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:270–279. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin F, Heidrich SM. Role of older adult’s illness schemata in coping with mild cognitive impairment. J Psychosom Res. 2012;72:357–363. - PubMed
    1. Wolinsky FD, Vander Weg MW, Howren MB, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive training using a visual speed of processing intervention in middle aged and older adults. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61624. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, et al. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2271–2281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eckert MA. Slowing down: Age-related neurobiological predictors of processing speed. Front Neurosci. 2011;5:25. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types