Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study
- PMID: 27321719
- DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.014
Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study
Abstract
Objective: to assess the mode of childbirth and adverse neonatal outcomes in women with a breech presentation with or without an external cephalic version attempt, and to compare the mode of childbirth among women with successful ECV to women with a spontaneous cephalic presentation.
Design: prospective matched cohort study.
Setting: 25 clusters (hospitals and its referring midwifery practices) in the Netherlands. Data of the Netherlands perinatal registry for the matched cohort.
Participants: singleton pregnancies from January 2011 to August 2012 with a fetus in breech presentation and a childbirth from 36 weeks gestation onwards. Spontaneous cephalic presentations (selected from national registry 2009 and 2010) were matched in a 2:1 ratio to cephalic presentations after a successful version attempt. Matching criteria were maternal age, parity, gestational age at childbirth and fetal gender. Main outcomes were mode of childbirth and neonatal outcomes.
Measurements and findings: of 1613 women eligible for external cephalic version, 1169 (72.5%) received an ECV attempt. The overall caesarean childbirth rate was significantly lower compared to women who did not receive a version attempt (57% versus 87%; RR 0.66 (0.62-0.70)). Women with a cephalic presentation after ECV compared to women with a spontaneous cephalic presentation had a decreased risk for instrumental vaginal childbirth (RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.29-0.94)) and an increased risk of overall caesarean childbirth (RR 1.7 (95%CI 1.2-2.5)).
Key conclusions: women who had a successful ECV are at increased risk for a caesarean childbirth but overall, ECV is an important tool to reduce the caesarean rate.
Implication for practice: ECV is an important tool to reduce the caesarean section rates.
Keywords: Breech presentation; External cephalic version; Mode of childbirth; Neonatal outcome.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Oct;35(10):883-888. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30809-4. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013. PMID: 24165055
-
Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor - a matched controlled study.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec;46(10):737-742. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 22. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28951278
-
[Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A63. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010. PMID: 20132565 Dutch.
-
[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Jan;48(1):81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.024. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020. PMID: 31678503 Review. French.
-
Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version after a previous caesarean delivery: A systematic review.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Oct;61(5):650-657. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13399. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021. PMID: 34169515
Cited by
-
Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis.PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 16;16(4):e1002778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002778. eCollection 2019 Apr. PLoS Med. 2019. PMID: 30990808 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical