Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 21;12(1):118.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0744-2.

Evaluation of temporal surveillance system sensitivity and freedom from bovine viral diarrhea in Danish dairy herds using scenario tree modelling

Affiliations

Evaluation of temporal surveillance system sensitivity and freedom from bovine viral diarrhea in Danish dairy herds using scenario tree modelling

Alessandro Foddai et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The temporal sensitivity of the surveillance system (TemSSe) for Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) in Danish dairy herds was evaluated. Currently, the Danish antibody blocking ELISA is used to test quarterly bulk tank milk (BTM). To optimize the surveillance system as an early warning system, we considered the possibility of using the SVANOVIR ELISA, as this test has been shown to detect BVD-positive herds earlier than the blocking ELISA in BTM tests. Information from data (2010) and outputs from two published stochastic models were fed into a stochastic scenario tree to estimate the TemSSe. For that purpose we considered: the risk of BVD introduction into the dairy population, the ELISA used and the high risk period (HRP) from BVD introduction to testing (at 90 or 365 days). The effect of introducing one persistently infected (PI) calf or one transiently infected (TI) milking cow into 1 (or 8) dairy herd(s) was investigated. Additionally we estimated the confidence in low (PLow) herd prevalence (<8/4109 infected herds) and the confidence in complete freedom (PFree) from BVD (< 1/4109).

Results: The TemSSe, the PLow, and the PFree were higher, when tests were performed 365 days after BVD introduction, than after 90 days. Estimates were usually higher for the SVANOVIR than for the blocking ELISA, and when a PI rather than a TI was introduced into the herd(s). For instance, with the current system, the median TemSSe was 64.5 %, 90 days after a PI calf was introduced into eight dairy herds. The related median PLow was 72.5 %. When a PI calf was introduced into one herd the median TemSSe was 12.1 %, while the related PFree was 51.6 %. With the SVANOVIR ELISA these estimates were 99.0 %; 98.9 %, 43.7 % and 62.4 %, respectively.

Conclusions: The replacement of the blocking ELISA with the SVANOVIR could increase the TemSSe, the PLow and PFree remarkably. Those results could be used to optimize the Danish BVD surveillance system. Furthermore, the approach proposed in this study, for including the effect of the HRP within the scenario tree methodology, could be applied to optimize early warning surveillance systems of different animal diseases.

Keywords: BVD; Freedom from disease; Scenario tree; Temporal surveillance system sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Stochastic scenario tree representing the BVD surveillance system for Danish dairy herds. PrPImpoCattle and PrPNoImpoCattle = proportion of dairy herds within the ImpoCattle and NoImpoCattle category, respectively. EPIImpoCattle and EPINoImpoCattle = effective probability of infection for the ImpoCattle and NoImpoCattle category. PTRImpoCattle and PTRNoImpoCattle = probability that the threshold prevalence is reached within the milking paddock at 90 or 365 days from BVDV introduction within herds of the ImpoCattle and NoImpoCattle category. Se = Expected sensitivity of the antibody ELISA used (Danish blocking ELISA or SVANOVIR) on BTM, when the threshold prevalence of seropositive milking cows is reached

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Foddai A, Enøe C, Stockmarr A, Krogh K, Uttenthal Å. Challenges for bovine viral diarrhoea virus antibody detection in bulk milk by antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays due to changes in milk production levels. Acta Vet Scand. 2015 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bitsch V, Rønsholt L. Control of bovine viral diarrhea virus infection without vaccines. Vet Clin Noth Am Food Anim Pract. 1995;11:627–640. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30471-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bitsch V, Hansen K-EL, Rønsholt L. Experiences from the Danish programme for eradication of bovine virus diarrhoea (BVD) 1994-1998 with special reference to legislation and causes of infection. Vet Microbiol. 2000;77:137–143. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00270-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McClurkin AW, Littledike ET, Cutlip RC, Frank GH, Coria MF, Bolin SR. Production of cattle immunotolerant to bovine viral diarrhea virus. Can J Comp Med. 1984;48:156–161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brownlie J, Clarke MC, Howard CJ, Pocock DH. Pathogenesis and epidemiology of bovine virus diarrhoea virus infection of cattle. Ann Rech Vét. 1987;18:157–166. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms