Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;48(11):2216-2221.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001018.

Evaluating Walking Intensity with Hip-Worn Accelerometers in Elders

Affiliations

Evaluating Walking Intensity with Hip-Worn Accelerometers in Elders

Duane B Corbett et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Accelerometer activity counts are used to objectively categorize physical activity levels. We examined the association between accelerometer activity counts and metabolic effort in older adults.

Methods: Forty-five older adults (76.3 ± 5.1 yr) completed a 400-m walk at both a usual and a rapid pace. A portable metabolic unit measured pulmonary gas exchange, whereas a hip-worn accelerometer measured activity counts. Participants were categorized as either a "slow walker" or a "fast walker" based on the threshold of 1.0 m·s during usual-pace walking.

Results: Activity counts during rapid (r = 0.62, P < 0.01) but not usual-pace (r = 0.24, P = 0.11) walking were significantly associated with METs. Slow walkers attained only half the activity counts of fast walkers during each walk condition (P < 0.01), while at the same time achieving between 82% and 90% of their MET level.

Conclusion: Accelerometers may misclassify the activity level of functionally impaired older adults with slow walking speed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Scatter plot and lines of best fit predicting metabolic rate with vertical axis activity counts recorded with a hip-worn accelerometer.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Oxygen consumption and average activity counts•min-1 during 400-m walk at A. usual and B. rapid pace. The data are categorized by individuals who walked greater than or less than 1.0 m•s-1 at a usual pace – a pace that designates older individuals as “slow walkers” with potential functional impairments. Dotted lines represent cut points for metabolic rate (3.0 METs) or accelerometer counts (2020 counts•min-1 and 1041 counts•min-1) that designate the walking intensity equal to or greater than moderate. Significant differences occurred in accelerometer counts between slow and fast walkers (P < 0.05).

References

    1. Abel MG, Hannon JC, Sell K, Lillie T, Conlin G, Anderson D. Validation of the Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers for walking and running in adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33(6):1155–64. - PubMed
    1. Bonomi AE, Cella DF, Hahn EA, et al. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(3):309–20. - PubMed
    1. Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BW, et al. Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people – results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(10):1675–80. - PubMed
    1. Cheung VH, Gray L, Karunanithi M. Review of accelerometry for determining daily activity among elderly patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(6):998–1014. - PubMed
    1. Copeland JL, Esliger DW. Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in active, healthy older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2009;17(1):17–30. - PubMed

Publication types