Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Jun 21;6(6):e011277.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011277.

Unit-based incident reporting and root cause analysis: variation at three hospital unit types

Cordula Wagner  1 , Hanneke Merten  2 , Laura Zwaan  2 , Sanne Lubberding  2 , Danielle Timmermans  2 , Marleen Smits  3
Affiliations
Observational Study

Unit-based incident reporting and root cause analysis: variation at three hospital unit types

Cordula Wagner et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To minimise adverse events in healthcare, various large-scale incident reporting and learning systems have been developed worldwide. Nevertheless, learning from patient safety incidents is going slowly. Local, unit-based reporting systems can help to get faster and more detailed insight into unit-specific safety issues. The aim of our study was to gain insight into types and causes of patient safety incidents in hospital units and to explore differences between unit types.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: 10 emergency medicine units, 10 internal medicine units and 10 general surgery units in 20 hospitals in the Netherlands participated. Patient safety incidents were reported by healthcare providers. Reports were analysed with root cause analysis. The results were compared between the 3 unit types.

Results: A total of 2028 incidents were reported in an average reporting period of 8 weeks per unit. More than half had some consequences for patients, such as a prolonged hospital stay or longer waiting time, and a small number resulted in patient harm. Significant differences in incident types and causes were found between unit types. Emergency units reported more incidents related to collaboration, whereas surgical and internal medicine units reported more incidents related to medication use. The distribution of root causes of surgical and emergency medicine units showed more mutual similarities than those of internal medicine units.

Conclusions: Comparable incidents and causes have been found in all units, but there were also differences between units and unit types. Unit-based incident reporting gives specific information and therefore makes improvements easier. We conclude that unit-based incident reporting has an added value besides hospital-wide or national reporting systems that already exist in various countries.

Keywords: ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine); SURGERY; hospital; incident reporting; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Webb RK, Currie M, Morgan CA et al. . The Australian Incident Monitoring Study: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993;21:520–8. - PubMed
    1. Leape LL. Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1633–8. 10.1056/NEJMNEJMhpr011493 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams SK, Osborn SS. The development of the National Reporting and Learning System in England and Wales, 2001–2005. Med J Aust 2006;184:S65–8. - PubMed
    1. Hutchinson A, Young TA, Cooper KL et al. . Trends in healthcare incident reporting and relationship to safety and quality data in acute hospitals: results from the National Reporting and Learning System. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:5–10. 10.1136/qshc.2007.022400 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/report-a-patient-safety-incident/about-repor... - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources