Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun 2:7:71-9.
doi: 10.2147/SAR.S85409. eCollection 2016.

Identifying and assessing the risk of opioid abuse in patients with cancer: an integrative review

Ashley-Nicole Carmichael  1 , Laura Morgan  1 , Egidio Del Fabbro  2
Affiliations
Review

Identifying and assessing the risk of opioid abuse in patients with cancer: an integrative review

Ashley-Nicole Carmichael et al. Subst Abuse Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: The misuse and abuse of opioid medications in many developed nations is a health crisis, leading to increased health-system utilization, emergency department visits, and overdose deaths. There are also increasing concerns about opioid abuse and diversion in patients with cancer, even at the end of life.

Aims: To evaluate the current literature on opioid misuse and abuse, and more specifically the identification and assessment of opioid-abuse risk in patients with cancer. Our secondary aim is to offer the most current evidence of best clinical practice and suggest future directions for research.

Materials and methods: Our integrative review included a literature search using the key terms "identification and assessment of opioid abuse in cancer", "advanced cancer and opioid abuse", "hospice and opioid abuse", and "palliative care and opioid abuse". PubMed, PsycInfo, and Embase were supplemented by a manual search.

Results: We found 691 articles and eliminated 657, because they were predominantly non cancer populations or specifically excluded cancer patients. A total of 34 articles met our criteria, including case studies, case series, retrospective observational studies, and narrative reviews. The studies were categorized into screening questionnaires for opioid abuse or alcohol, urine drug screens to identify opioid misuse or abuse, prescription drug-monitoring programs, and the use of universal precautions.

Conclusion: Screening questionnaires and urine drug screens indicated at least one in five patients with cancer may be at risk of opioid-use disorder. Several studies demonstrated associations between high-risk patients and clinical outcomes, such as aberrant behavior, prolonged opioid use, higher morphine-equivalent daily dose, greater health care utilization, and symptom burden.

Keywords: prescription drug-monitoring programs; screening questionnaires; urine drug screens.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Vital Statistics System: mortality data. 2015. [Accessed March 18, 2016]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/deaths.htm.
    1. Case A, Deaton A. Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(49):15078–15083. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackhall LJ, Alfson ED, Barclay JS. Screening for substance abuse and diversion in Virginia hospices. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(3):237–242. - PubMed
    1. Tan PD, Barclay JS, Blackhall LJ. Do palliative care clinics screen for substance abuse and diversion? Results of a national survey. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(9):752–757. - PubMed
    1. Nuckols TK, Anderson L, Popescu I, et al. Opioid prescribing: a systematic review and critical appraisal of guidelines for chronic pain. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(1):38–47. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources