Sex difference in muscle cross-sectional area of athletes and non-athletes
- PMID: 2733081
- DOI: 10.1080/02640418908729820
Sex difference in muscle cross-sectional area of athletes and non-athletes
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether there is a sex difference in limb muscle cross-sectional area by comparing upper- and lower-body limb fat-free cross-sectional areas (FFCSAs) adjusted for differences in fat-free weight (FFW), in male and female athletes with similar histories of upper-body physical conditioning and in non-athletes. Limb FFCSAs were calculated from circumferences corrected for subcutaneous fat thickness and FFW was estimated from body density measured by underwater weighing in 24 male and 25 female swimmers and 23 male and 25 female non-athletes, 15 to 28 years of age. The male swimmers had 32% larger FFWs and 49% larger upper-arm, similar forearm and 23% larger thigh FFCSAs compared to the female swimmers. The male non-athletes had 34% larger FFWs, 61% larger upper-arms, 54% larger forearms and 35% larger thighs than female non-athletes. To adjust for differences in body size, analysis of covariance was performed on the FFCSAs using FFW as the covariate. For the swimmers there were no significant differences (P greater than 0.05) in the adjusted FFCSAs. For the non-athletes, males had significantly larger adjusted upper-arm and forearm FFCSAs than the females but thigh FFCSAs were not significantly different (P greater than 0.05). These results suggest that sex differences in muscle area of the arms, may be partially attributed to long-term activity differences between sexes. Possible long-term differences in activity between sexes should be considered in comparisons of functional or performance measures between sexes.
Similar articles
-
The bone response to non-weight-bearing exercise is sport-, site-, and sex-specific.Clin J Sport Med. 2007 Mar;17(2):123-8. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318032129d. Clin J Sport Med. 2007. PMID: 17414480
-
Muscle mass of competitive male athletes.J Sports Sci. 1993 Feb;11(1):3-8. doi: 10.1080/02640419308729956. J Sports Sci. 1993. PMID: 8450582
-
Lower and upper body anaerobic performance in male and female adolescent athletes.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Feb;27(2):235-41. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995. PMID: 7723647
-
Estimation of body composition in competitive swimmers by means of three different techniques.Int J Sports Med. 1997 Jul;18(5):363-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972647. Int J Sports Med. 1997. PMID: 9298777
-
Weight-for-height values and limb anthropometric composition of tube-fed children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy.Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e839-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1029. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 16322142
Cited by
-
Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains.Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1078301. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1078301. eCollection 2022. Front Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36685189 Free PMC article.
-
Sex Difference in Female and Male Ice Swimmers for Different Strokes and Water Categories Over Short and Middle Distances: A Descriptive Study.Sports Med Open. 2022 May 10;8(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00451-w. Sports Med Open. 2022. PMID: 35536463 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of age and sex on speed-strength performance in children between 10 and 14 years of age.Front Physiol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1092874. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1092874. eCollection 2023. Front Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36895629 Free PMC article.
-
Is the gender difference in peak VO2 greater for arm than leg exercise?Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;60(2):149-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00846036. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990. PMID: 2335173
-
Differences between the sexes in athletes' body composition and lower limb bioimpedance values.Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2018 Apr 16;7(4):573-581. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.573. eCollection 2017 Oct-Dec. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2018. PMID: 29721459 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources