Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 18:3:452-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2016.05.005. eCollection 2016.

Efficiency of QuEChERS approach for determining 52 pesticide residues in honey and honey bees

Pau Calatayud-Vernich  1 , Fernando Calatayud  2 , Enrique Simó  2 , Yolanda Picó  1
Affiliations

Efficiency of QuEChERS approach for determining 52 pesticide residues in honey and honey bees

Pau Calatayud-Vernich et al. MethodsX. .

Abstract

A comparison between QuEChERS and other pesticide extraction procedures for honey and honey bee matrices is discussed. Honey bee matrix was extracted by solvent based procedure whereas solid phase extraction was the protocol for the honey matrix. The citrate buffered QuEChERS method was used for both matrices. The methods were evaluated regarding cost (equipment and reagents), time, accuracy, precision, sensitivity and versatility. The results proved that the QuEChERS protocol was the most efficient method for the extraction of the selected pesticides in both matrices. •QuEChERS is the most economical and less time-consuming procedure.•SPE and solvent-based extraction procedures show equivalent recoveries to QuEChERS.•QuEChERS can be used to extract pesticide residues from both matrices.

Keywords: LC–MS/MS; QuEChERS; QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and Safe); SPE (solvent phase extraction); Solvent extraction; honey; honey bee; pesticide; solid phase extraction (SPE); solvent extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Limits of quantitation (LOQs) of QuEChERS, SPE and solvent methods in honey and honey bee matrices.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Matrix effects of QuEChERS, SPE and solvent methods in honey and honey bee matrices.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Accuracy (Recoveries) and precision (RSDs) validation parameters of QuEChERS, SPE and solvent methods in honey and honey bee matrices.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Honey and honey bee composition (%) , , .
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Calatayud-Vernich P., Calatayud F., Simó E., Suarez-Varela M.M., Picó Y. Influence of pesticide use in fruit orchards during blooming on honeybee mortality in 4 experimental apiaries. Sci. Total Environ. 2016;541:33–41. - PubMed
    1. Wiest L., Bulete A., Giroud B., Fratta C., Amic S., Lambert O. Multi-residue analysis of 80 environmental contaminants in honeys, honeybees and pollens by one extraction procedure followed by liquid and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A. 2011;1218:5743–5756. - PubMed
    1. Niell S., Jesus F., Perez C., Mendoza Y., Diaz R., Franco J. QuEChERS adaptability for the analysis of pesticide residues in beehive products seeking the development of an agroecosystem sustainability monitor. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2015;63:4484–4492. - PubMed
    1. Ghini S., Fernandez M., Pico Y., Marin R., Fini F., Manes J. Occurrence and distribution of pesticides in the province of Bologna, Italy, using honeybees as bioindicators. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2004;47:479–488. - PubMed
    1. Blasco C., Vazquez-Roig P., Onghena M., Masia A., Pico Y. Analysis of insecticides in honey by liquid chromatography–ion trap-mass spectrometry: comparison of different extraction procedures. J. Chromatogr. A. 2011;1218:4892–4901. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources