Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;2(1):http://www.symbiosisonlinepublishing.com/urology-nephrology/urology-nephrology09.php.
doi: 10.15226/2473-6430/2/1/00109. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

Age of the mother as a risk factor and timing of hypospadias repair according to severity

Affiliations

Age of the mother as a risk factor and timing of hypospadias repair according to severity

Juan Carlos Jorge et al. SOJ Urol Nephrol Open Access. 2016.

Abstract

Background & objectives: Hypospadias is characterized by a displacement of the urethral opening in males that can change from the typical position within the glans penis to a subcoronal position (Type I), to anywhere along the ventral shaft (Type II), to penoscrotal, scrotal, or perineal positions (Type III). We and others have previously reported that age of the mother (≥ 40 years old) is a risk factor for having a child with hypospadias, but there is a scarcity of reports on whether such risk is higher for having a child with the mild (Type I) or the more severe forms (Types II and III). In addition, we aimed to assess the timing of hypospadias repair according to severity.

Methods: Parents of children with hypospadias were interviewed by using a series of questionnaires (n = 128 cases). Severity was confirmed in the clinic and age of the mother was self-reported. Number of surgeries, age of child by the first and the last intervention was also assessed. Ordered logistic regression and the Brant test were employed to calculate risk between mild (Type I) and severe cases (Types II and III), and the assumption of proportional odds, respectively. The Mann-Whitney U Test was used to compare number of surgeries and age by the last repair between mild and severe cases. One-way ANOVA was employed to compare age of the child at the time of first surgery across severities (Types I - III).

Results: Women ≥ 40 years of age are 3.89 times [95% CI: 1.20-12.64] at a higher risk for having a child with the more severe forms of the condition than younger women. Repair of Type I was accomplished with 1 intervention whereas more severe cases required 1 - 4 (2 ± 0.5) surgical interventions. The timing for hypospadias repair of Type I cases occurred at an average age of 16.2 ± 4.88 months, of Type II cases occurred at an average age of 20.3 ± 8.15 months whereas the average age of the first hypospadias repair among Type III cases was 12.68 ± 2.52 months. Number of surgeries according to severity (p ≤ 0.0018, z-ratio = 2.91) and age difference for the timing of last repair (p ≤ 0.045, z-ratio = 1.69) were statistically different, but not the age difference for the first repair.

Conclusions: Increased maternal age is associated with the most severe forms of hypospadias. There is room for improvement for the timing of hypospadias repair according to severity.

Keywords: Hypospadias; Hypospadias repair; Hypospadias risk; Hypospadias severity; Maternal age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations

a. Conflict of Interest: N/A

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Number and timing of surgeries according to hypospadias severity
Panel A. Surgical repair of Type 1 (mild) cases was accomplished with one intervention whereas Types II and III (severe) cases required two or more interventions. B. Age of the child (in months) at the time of the first surgical repair among Type I (white), Type II (grey), and Type III cases (black) are shown. C. Age of the child (in months) at the time of the last surgical repair among Type I (mild) cases versus Types II and III (severe) cases are shown. Data is expressed as average ± SEM; ** p ≤ 0. 0018; * p ≤ 0.045. See text for details.

References

    1. Rios LT, Araujo Júnior E, Nardozza LM, Rolo LC, Hatanaka AR, Moron AF, Martins Mda G. Prenatal diagnosis of penoscrotal hypospadia in third trimester by two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography: a case report. Case Rep Urol. 2012;2012:142814. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cayan F, Cayan S. Prenatal diagnosis of penoscrotal hypospadias and review of the literature. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2013;39(2):116–118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG. Before we are born: Essentials of embryology and birth defects. 8th. USA: Elsevier Sanuders; 2013.
    1. Carmichel SL, Shaw GM, Lammer EJ. Environmental and genetic contributors to hypospadias: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(7):499–510. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baskin LS. Can we prevent hypospadias? Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2007;3(6):420–425. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources