Academic family health teams: Part 2: patient perceptions of access
- PMID: 27331229
- PMCID: PMC4721858
Academic family health teams: Part 2: patient perceptions of access
Abstract
Objective: To explore patients' perceptions of primary care (PC) in the early development of academic family health teams (aFHTs)--interprofessional PC teams delivering care where family medicine and other health professional learners are trained--focusing on patients' perceptions of access and patients' satisfaction with services.
Design: Self-administered survey.
Setting: Six aFHTs in Ontario.
Participants: Adult patients attending appointments and administrators at each of the aFHTs.
Main outcome measures: Answers to questions about access from the Primary Care Assessment Tool Adult Expanded Version, the Primary Care Assessment Survey, and research team questions.
Results: The response rate was 47.3% (1026 of 2167). The mean (SD) Primary Care Assessment Tool first-contact accessibility score was 2.28 (0.36) out of 4, with 96.5% of patients rating access less than 3, which was the minimum expected level of care. Two-thirds (66.6%) indicated someone from their aFHTs would definitely or probably see them the same day if they were sick, 56.8% could definitely or probably get advice quickly by telephone, and 14.5% indicated it was definitely or probably difficult to be seen by their primary health care provider (HCP). Additionally, 46.9% indicated they would like to get medical advice by e-mail. For a routine or follow-up visit, 73.4% would be willing to see another aFHT physician if their regular provider were unavailable, while only 48.3% would see a nonphysician HCP. If sick, 88.2% would see another aFHT physician and 55.2% would see a nonphysician HCP. Most (75.3%) were satisfied with access to their regular HCP.
Conclusion: Although patients are generally satisfied with care, there is room for improvement in access. Strategies are needed to enhance access to care, including addressing appropriate roles and scopes of practice for nonphysician HCPs. The accessibility challenges for aFHTs will likely affect new family physicians and other HCPs training in these practices and their approach to future practice.
Objectif: Vérifier ce que les patients pensent des soins de première ligne (SPL) au moment où s’installent des équipes universitaires de santé familiale (EUSF) – des équipes interprofessionnelles dispensant des soins de première ligne dans lesquelles des professionnels de la médecine familiale et d’autres professionnels de la santé sont formés - et ce, en ciblant les quatre domaines principaux des SPL.
Type d’étude: Une enquête auto-administrée.
Contexte: Six EUSF de l’Ontario.
Participants: Des patients adultes venant à leur rendez-vous et des administrateurs de chacune des EUSF.
Principaux paramètres à l’étude: Les réponses aux questions du Primary Care Assessment Tool Adult Expanded Version portant sur l’accessibilité, à celles du Primary Care Assessment Survey et à celles adressées aux équipes de recherche.
Résultats: Le taux de réponse était de 47,3 % (1026 sur 2167). Le score moyen (DS) obtenu au Primary Care Assessment Tool pour l’accès au premier contact était de 2,28 (0,36) sur 4, avec 96,5 % des patients codant l’accessibilité à moins de 3, ce chiffre étant le niveau minimum attendu pour les soins. Les deux-tiers (66,6 %) indiquaient qu’ils seraient certainement ou probablement vus le même jour par quelqu’un de leur EUSF s’ils étaient malades, 56,8 % estimaient qu’ils pourraient certainement ou probablement recevoir rapidement un conseil au téléphone et 14,5 % disaient qu’il était certainement ou probablement difficile de voir leur soignant habituel. De plus, 46,9 % ont mentionné qu’ils souhaiteraient recevoir des conseils d’ordre médical par courriel. Lors d’une visite de routine ou de suivi, 73,4 % des patients accepteraient de voir un autre médecin de l’EUSF si leur médecin habituel n’était pas disponible, alors que seulement 48,3 % accepteraient un soignant non médecin. En cas de maladie, 88,2 % accepteraient de voir un autre médecin de l’EUSF tandis que 55,2 % accepteraient un soignant non médecin. La plupart (75,3 %) étaient satisfaits de l’accès à leur soignant habituel.
Conclusion: Même si les patients étaient généralement satisfaits des soins reçus, il est encore possible d’améliorer l’accès. Il faudra des stratégies pour améliorer l’accès aux soins, par exemple en précisant les rôles et les domaines de pratique des soignants non médecins. Il est probable que les problèmes d’accessibilité que les EUSF devront affronter auront un effet sur les nouveaux médecins de famille et sur les autres professionnels de la santé que ces cliniques forment, mais aussi sur la pratique future de ces soignants.
Similar articles
-
Academic family health teams: Part 1: patient perceptions of core primary care domains.Can Fam Physician. 2016 Jan;62(1):e23-30. Can Fam Physician. 2016. PMID: 27331228 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the implementation of collaborative teams in community family practice using the Primary Care Assessment Tool.Can Fam Physician. 2019 Dec;65(12):e515-e522. Can Fam Physician. 2019. PMID: 31831500 Free PMC article.
-
Patient trade-offs between continuity and access in primary care interprofessional teaching clinics in Canada: a cross-sectional survey using discrete choice experiment.BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e023578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023578. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30904840 Free PMC article.
-
Standards of access and quality in primary care.J R Soc Med. 2001;94 Suppl 39(Suppl 39):43-5. J R Soc Med. 2001. PMID: 11383430 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integrating Family Medicine and Community Pharmacy to Improve Patient Access to Quality Primary Care and Enhance Health Outcomes.Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 May;82(4):6572. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6572. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018. PMID: 29867245 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
First contact: what does it mean for family practice in 2017?Can Fam Physician. 2017 Mar;63(3):256. Can Fam Physician. 2017. PMID: 28292809 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ten years of the Primary Care Assessment Tool in Canadian Family Physician: what is next? Contributions from the Brazilian National Health Survey and the Canadian Community Health Survey.Can Fam Physician. 2021 Jul;67(7):479-480. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6707479. Can Fam Physician. 2021. PMID: 34261705 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Academic family health teams: Part 1: patient perceptions of core primary care domains.Can Fam Physician. 2016 Jan;62(1):e23-30. Can Fam Physician. 2016. PMID: 27331228 Free PMC article.
-
Using positive deviance to improve timely access in primary care.BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Oct;10(4):e001228. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001228. BMJ Open Qual. 2021. PMID: 34649853 Free PMC article.
-
Impact on patient satisfaction and importance of medical intake and office staff in a multidisciplinary, one-stop shop transgender program in Indianapolis, Indiana.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Aug 15;12:665-673. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S216969. eCollection 2019. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019. PMID: 31616155 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Starfield B. Primary care: an increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services. SESPAS report 2012. Gac Sanit. 2012;26(Suppl 1):20–6. Epub 2012 Jan 21. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous