The use of patient-reported outcomes in advanced breast cancer clinical trials: a review of the published literature
- PMID: 27331272
- DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1205005
The use of patient-reported outcomes in advanced breast cancer clinical trials: a review of the published literature
Abstract
Objective: As a means to measure quantifiable signs, symptoms, and impacts of a disease or its treatment, patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments can be applied to numerous settings, including use in drug development to support labeling claims. This research summarizes the use of PROs in trials for 16 commonly used regulatory approved treatments for advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Methods: For each treatment (n = 16), a literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. The primary criterion for selection was the report of studies that used PROs to evaluate treatment benefit and/or toxicity in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. From this, a sub-set of articles for each treatment were selected for full-text review where PRO-related information was extracted and summarized.
Results: The searches yielded 1727 publications. Following abstract review, 1702 were excluded because they failed to meet criteria, or were duplicates or less relevant for PRO information reported. Thus, 25 articles were reviewed in detail for this evaluation. Eleven PRO instruments were identified from these publications. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core (EORTC QLQ-C30) was utilized the most frequently (n = 13, 52.0%). Most publications reported PROs positioned as secondary endpoints (n = 20, 80.0%); described some of the statistical analyses applied to PRO data (n = 21, 84.0%); and specified PRO results (n = 23, 92.0%).
Conclusions: While several of the publications provided some information on how PROs were utilized, many did not describe details for PRO administration, scoring, analyses, and results interpretation. While it is encouraging that PROs are often used in clinical trials for patients with metastatic breast cancer, they are not commonly used to support endpoints that establish the basis for label claims. Because they yield direct insight into the patient experience of a condition, PROs may be used to provide a more comprehensive perspective of the benefits and risks from treatment.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Clinical trial; Drug labeling; Food and Drug Administration; Oncology; Patient-reported outcomes.
Similar articles
-
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) focused on adverse events (PRO-AEs) in adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer: clinical and translational implications.Support Care Cancer. 2017 Feb;25(2):549-558. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3437-2. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Support Care Cancer. 2017. PMID: 27747478
-
Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels.Control Clin Trials. 2004 Dec;25(6):535-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.09.003. Control Clin Trials. 2004. PMID: 15588741 Review.
-
Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life.Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;18(3):351-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00234.x. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15147288 Review.
-
Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001.Value Health. 2003 Sep-Oct;6(5):522-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65309.x. Value Health. 2003. PMID: 14627058
-
Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 14;19(9):e322. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8210. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28912116 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Real-world patient-reported outcomes of women receiving initial endocrine-based therapy for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer in five European countries.BMC Cancer. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07294-2. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32894087 Free PMC article.
-
Breast-cancer specific comprehensive archive of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for clinical research and clinical practice in oncology: Results from the PRO4All project.Breast. 2024 Dec;78:103817. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103817. Epub 2024 Sep 28. Breast. 2024. PMID: 39362075 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between safety, tolerability, and toxicity and the reporting of health-related quality of life in phase III randomized trials in common solid tumors.Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):7888-7895. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3390. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Cancer Med. 2020. PMID: 32886422 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive review of statistical methods for analysing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used as primary outcomes in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published by the UK's Health Technology Assessment (HTA) journal (1997-2020).BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e051673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051673. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34489292 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selecting patient-reported outcome measures for a patient-facing technology.JAMIA Open. 2023 Dec 13;6(4):ooad104. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad104. eCollection 2023 Dec. JAMIA Open. 2023. PMID: 38098479 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous