Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;17(1):140-150.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.13929. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

Banff Histopathological Consensus Criteria for Preimplantation Kidney Biopsies

Affiliations

Banff Histopathological Consensus Criteria for Preimplantation Kidney Biopsies

H Liapis et al. Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

The Banff working group on preimplantation biopsy was established to develop consensus criteria (best practice guidelines) for the interpretation of preimplantation kidney biopsies. Digitally scanned slides were used (i) to evaluate interobserver variability of histopathologic findings, comparing frozen sections with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue of wedge and needle core biopsies, and (ii) to correlate consensus histopathologic findings with graft outcome in a cohort of biopsies from international medical centers. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) and univariable and multivariable statistical analyses were performed. Good to fair reproducibility was observed in semiquantitative scores for percentage of glomerulosclerosis, arterial intimal fibrosis and interstitial fibrosis on frozen wedge biopsies. Evaluation of frozen wedge and core biopsies was comparable for number of glomeruli, but needle biopsies showed worse ICCs for glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. A consensus evaluation form is provided to help standardize the reporting of histopathologic lesions in donor biopsies. It should be recognized that histologic parameters may not correlate with graft outcome in studies based on organs deemed to be acceptable after careful clinical assessment. Significant limitations remain in the assessment of implantation biopsies.

Keywords: biopsy; clinical research/practice; donors and donation: deceased; kidney (allograft) function/dysfunction; kidney failure/injury; pathology/histopathology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of whole‐slide imaging of a needle core implantation biopsy used for digital scoring.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Donor biopsy scoring sheet.

References

    1. Israni AK, Salkowski N, Gustafson S, et al. New national allocation policy for deceased donor kidneys in the United States and possible effect on patient outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 25: 1842–1848. - PMC - PubMed
    1. OPTN/SRTR report 2008. Table 3.2. Available from: http://www.ustransplant.org.
    1. Policy 3.5: Organ Distribution: Allocation of deceased kidneys 6/20/2008. Policy 3.5.9.2: desirable information for kidney offers. Available from: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/PoliciesandBylaws.
    1. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 713–723. - PubMed
    1. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: Updates and future directions. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 753–760. - PubMed

Publication types