Five-year retrospective study on success, survival and incidence of complications of single crowns supported by dental implants
- PMID: 27334865
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.12843
Five-year retrospective study on success, survival and incidence of complications of single crowns supported by dental implants
Abstract
Objective: To determine the survival and the incidence of biologic and technical complications of implant-supported single crowns after 5 years of function.
Material and methods: Patients treated with dental implants at the National Dental Centre, Singapore, from 2006 to 2010 were recruited from the Implant Registry and evaluated by two clinicians. One hundred and ninety-four patients, with 266 implant single crowns (SCs), were examined clinically for biologic and technical parameters. Digital radiographs were also obtained. Failure and complication rates were calculated based on the person-time at risk.
Results: The mean biologic time in function was 5.9 ± 1.3 years. None of the implants had been lost, resulting in a 5-year survival of 100%. The corresponding success (complication-free) rate was 92.9% (95% CI: 89.2, 95.4). The mean prosthetic time in function was 5.2 ± 1.5 years, with a 5-year survival of implant-supported SCs of 98.2% (95% CI: 95.8, 99.3). The corresponding success rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 84.8, 92.0). The 5-year incidence of biologic complications, defined as PPD ≥6 mm with bleeding on probing/suppuration, in the presence of ≥2.5 mm of radiographic bone loss, was 7.1% (95% CI: 4.6, 10.9). The 5-year incidence of technical complications was 6.5% (95% CI: 3.9, 10.7) for fracture of the veneering material, 4.3% (95% CI: 2.4, 7.7) for loss of retention, 2.1% (95% CI: 1.0, 4.7) for abutment screw loosening and 0.4% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.5) for abutment fracture.
Conclusions: High survival rates (98.4%) for both the single tooth implants and the respective single crowns were demonstrated after 5.2 ± 1.5 years. However, the success rates were considerably lower (84.9%), indicating that biologic and technical complications were frequent.
Keywords: implant complications; implant dentistry; implant survival; outcomes; prosthetics; retrospective study; single crowns.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):435-44. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4794. Int J Prosthodont. 2016. PMID: 27611744
-
Single-Tooth Rehabilitations Supported by Dental Implants Used in an Immediate-Provisionalization Protocol: Report on Long-Term Outcome with Retrospective Follow-Up.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e511-9. doi: 10.1111/cid.12278. Epub 2014 Dec 23. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25536361
-
Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):434-44. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12152. Epub 2014 Apr 18. J Prosthodont. 2014. PMID: 24750435
-
The clinical performance of all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:196-223. doi: 10.1111/clr.13337. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 30306684
-
Prosthetic failure in implant dentistry.Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jan;59(1):195-214. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Sep 22. Dent Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 25434566 Review.
Cited by
-
Early Loading of Mandibular Molar Single Implants: 1 Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 4;13(18):3912. doi: 10.3390/ma13183912. Materials (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32899723 Free PMC article.
-
How do peri-implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri-implantitis? A critical review.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18(Suppl Suppl 18):100-123. doi: 10.1111/clr.13264. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 30306697 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Criteria for success in dental implants].Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 1;37(1):1-6. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.01.001. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 30854810 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review.Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;12(7):200. doi: 10.3390/dj12070200. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39056987 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Primary Stability of Dental Implants in Low-Density (10 and 20 pcf) Polyurethane Foam Blocks: Conical vs Cylindrical Implants.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 11;17(8):2617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082617. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32290361 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources