Is Subdural Peritoneal Shunt Placement an Effective Tool for the Management of Recurrent/Chronic Subdural Hematoma?
- PMID: 27335718
- PMCID: PMC4914066
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.613
Is Subdural Peritoneal Shunt Placement an Effective Tool for the Management of Recurrent/Chronic Subdural Hematoma?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE : To describe a surgical technique and to report using a retrospective study the efficacy of peritoneal shunts for the treatment of recurrent/chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). We describe the considerations, complications, and outcomes related to this technique. METHODS : In a retrospective cohort study, 125 charts with a diagnosis of subacute/chronic subdural hematoma were assigned for evaluation. Of the charts reviewed, 18 charts were found from subjects with a diagnosis of recurrent sub-acute or chronic subdural hematoma. All patients had undergone initial surgical treatment of their condition followed by peritoneal shunt placement to help alleviate intracranial pressure. Factors including the age, size of subdural hematoma, number of previous events, BMI, complications, survival, and clinical course were analyzed. RESULTS : After subdural peritoneal shunt placement all patients had full neurological recovery with no complaints of headaches, lethargy, weakness, confusion or seizures. None of the cases had new subdural hematoma episodes after placement for a minimum of a two-year period (mean 26.1 months) (range 24.3-48.6 months). No postoperative complications were reported. The rates of postoperative hemorrhage, infection, distal catheter revision, and perioperative seizures was found to be zero percent. Shunt drainage was successful in all cases, draining 85% of the blood in the first 48 hours. There was no significant relationship between complications and the use of anticoagulants four weeks after surgery.
Conclusions: Peritoneal shunts, though rarely used, are a viable option in the treatment of sub-acute/chronic subdural hematomas. When pursuing this treatment, this technique is recommended to mitigate the risks of repeat surgical intervention and lessen perioperative time in high-risk patients.
Keywords: craniotomy; mental status; shunt; subdural hematoma; trauma.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

References
-
- Various surgical treatments of chronic subdural hematoma and outcome in 172 patients: IS membranectomy necessary? Lee J, Ebel H, Ernestus R, Klug N. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090301903007675 Surg Nerol. 2004;61:523–527. - PubMed
-
- Acute intracranial bleeding and recurrence after burr hole craniostomy for chronic subdural hematoma. Pang CH, Lee SE, Kim CH, Kim JE, Kang HS, Park CK, Paek SH, Kim CH, Jahng TA, Kim JW, Kim YH, Kim DG, Chung CK, Jung HW, Yoo H. J Neurosurg. 2015;123:65–74. - PubMed
-
- Chronic subdural haematoma: modern management and emerging therapies. Kolias AG, Chari A, Santarius T, Hutchinson PJ. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10:570–578. - PubMed
-
- A prospective randomized study of use of drain versus no drain after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. Singh AK, Suryanarayanan B, Choudhary A, Prasad A, Singh S, Gupta LN. Neurol India. 2014;62:169–174. - PubMed
-
- Clinical factors of recurrent chronic subdural hematoma. Oishi M, Toyama M, Tamatani S, Kitazawa T, Saito M. Neurol Med Chir. 2001;41:382–386. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources