Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar 18:2014:762096.
doi: 10.1155/2014/762096. eCollection 2014.

The Evolution of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Tips

Affiliations
Review

The Evolution of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Tips

Fabrizio Fanelli. ISRN Hepatol. .

Abstract

Since Richter's description in the literature in 1989 of the first procedure on human patients, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been worldwide considered as a noninvasive technique to manage portal hypertension complications. TIPS succeeds in lowering the hepatic sinusoidal pressure and in increasing the circulatory flow, thus reducing sodium retention, ascites recurrence, and variceal bleeding. Required several revisions of the shunt TIPS can be performed in case of different conditions such as hepatorenal syndrome, hepatichydrothorax, portal vein thrombosis, and Budd-Chiari syndrome. Most of the previous studies on TIPS procedure were based on the use of bare stents and most patients chose TIPS 2-3 years after traditional treatment, thus making TIPS appear to be not superior to endoscopy in survival rates. Bare stents were associated with higher incidence of shunt failure and consequently patients required several revisions during the follow-up. With the introduction of a dedicated e-PTFE covered stent-graft, these problems were completely solved, No more reinterventions are required with a tremendous improvement of patient's quality of life. One of the main drawbacks of the use of e-PTFE covered stent-graft is higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy. In those cases refractory to the conventional medical therapy, a shunt reduction must be performed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wright A. S., Rikkers L. F. Current management of portal hypertension. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2005;9(7):992–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Casado M., Bosch J., García-Pagán J. C., et al. Clinical events after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: correlation with hemodynamic findings. Gastroenterology. 1998;114(6):1296–1303. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70436-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bari K., Garcia-Tsao G. Treatment of portal hypertension. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012;18(11):1166–1175. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i11.1166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyer T. D., Haskal Z. J. The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hypertension: update 2009. Hepatology. 2010;51(1):1–16. doi: 10.1002/hep.23383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richter G. M., Palmaz J. C., Nöldge G., et al. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stentshunt (TIPSS): a new nonoperative, transjugular percutaneous procedure. Radiologe. 1989;29(8):406–411. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources