Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 19:2:2333794X14568453.
doi: 10.1177/2333794X14568453. eCollection 2015.

Retrospective Review of Current Nasojejunal Tube Insertion Practice

Natasha Sheikh  1 , Michelle Falkiner  1 , Mary-Louise Greer  2
Affiliations

Retrospective Review of Current Nasojejunal Tube Insertion Practice

Natasha Sheikh et al. Glob Pediatr Health. .

Abstract

Repeated fluoroscopically guided nasojejunal tube (NJT) insertions, particularly in children, can pose health risks through increased radiation exposure. We analyzed frequency of NJT reinsertions and associated radiation exposure through retrospective evaluation of children <18 years at our institution who underwent fluoroscopically guided NJT insertions from 2007 to 2012. Age and weight, reinsertion frequency per patient, radiation dose (dose actual percentage [DAP]), time interval between, and indication for reinsertion were recorded. A total of 252 children (3 days to17 years, 11 months) had 449 NJT insertions. Reinsertions occurred in 105 (41.7%) patients with 14 (5.6%) having ≥5 reinsertions, and 67.6% of reinsertions occurring in patients <1 year. Mean DAP increased with frequency of reinsertion, along with age and weight. Most common indication for reinsertion was a pulled NJT (34.0%). Fluoroscopic NJT reinsertion was most frequent in younger, smaller patients. Self-guided, bedside NJT insertion, and/or earlier instigation of definitive nutritional therapy delivery should be considered.

Keywords: children; fluoroscopy; nasojejunal tube; radiation dose; self-guided technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Number of patients having single and multiple insertions.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Number of NJT single and multiple insertions.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
NJT reinsertion frequency according to age.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Frequency of reinsertion in each time interval. (n = number of NJT procedures included in specific time interval; total = 197).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Indications for repeat insertions (N = 197).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Reinsertion frequency in patients in unplanned pulled group.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prieto MB, Cid JLH. Malnutrition in the critically ill child: the importance of enteral nutrition. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:4353-4366. doi:10.3390/ijerph8114353. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holmes S. Enteral nutrition: an overview. Nurs Stand. 2012;26(39):41-46. doi:10.7748/ns2012.05.26.39.41.c9133. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pearce CB, Duncan HD. Enteral feeding. Nasogastric, nasojejunal, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or jejunostomy: its indications and limitations. Postgrad Med J. 2002;78:198-204. doi:10.1136/pmj.78.918.198. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phipps LM, Weber MD, Ginder BR, Hulse MA, Thomas NJ. A randomized controlled trial comparing three different techniques of nasojejunal feeding tube placement in critically ill children. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005;29:420-424. doi:10.1177/0148607105029006420. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hwang JY, Shin JH, Lee YJ, et al. Fluoroscopically guided nasojejunal enteral tube placement in infants and young children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:545-548. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1341. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources