Feasibility of a brief, intensive weight loss intervention to improve reproductive outcomes in obese, subfertile women: a pilot study
- PMID: 27336206
- PMCID: PMC5797426
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.004
Feasibility of a brief, intensive weight loss intervention to improve reproductive outcomes in obese, subfertile women: a pilot study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a brief, intensive weight loss intervention (IWL) to improve reproductive outcomes in obese subfertile women.
Design: Pilot study of IWL versus standard-of-care nutrition counseling (SCN).
Setting: Single-site, academic institution.
Patient(s): Obese women (body mass index, 35-45 kg/m2) with anovulatory subfertility.
Intervention(s): Women were rigorously prescreened to rule out secondary causes of subfertility. Eligible women were randomized to IWL or SCN. IWL consisted of 12 weeks of very-low-energy diet (800 kcal/day) + 4 weeks of a low-calorie conventional food-based diet (CFD) to promote 15% weight loss. SCN consisted of 16 weeks of CFD to promote ≥5% weight loss. Women were transitioned to weight maintenance diets and referred back to reproductive endocrinology for ovulation induction.
Main outcome measure(s): Feasibility of recruitment, randomization, intervention implementation, and retention.
Result(s): Thirty-nine women were screened; 25 (64%) were eligible to participate, and 14 of those eligible (56%) agreed to be randomized, seven in each group. One withdrew from the IWL group and two from the SCN group. Percent weight loss was greater in the IWL group than in the SCN group (13% ± 5% vs. 4% ± 4%). Three of six women in the IWL group conceived and delivered term pregnancies. No pregnancies occurred in the SCN group.
Conclusion(s): After rigorous screening, 44% of eligible women completed the study. IWL was associated with greater percentage weight loss and improvements in insulin sensitivity.
Clinical trial registration: NCT01894074.
Keywords: Obesity; anovulatory; intensive dietary intervention; weight loss.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Rothberg, Lanham, Randolph, and Smith and Ms. Fowler and Miller have nothing to disclose. The WMP has received non-financial support from Optifast (Nestle®).
Figures
Comment in
-
Evidence-based research for weight management of the obese woman around the time of conception is not as simple as you think!Fertil Steril. 2016 Oct;106(5):1049-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 26. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 27473355 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA. 2012;307(5):49–7. - PubMed
-
- Grodstein F, Goldman MB, Cramer DW. Body mass index and ovulatory infertility. Epidemiology. 1994;5(2):247–50. - PubMed
-
- Lake JK, Power C, Cole TJ. Women’s reproductive health: the role of body mass index in early and adult life. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997;21(6):432–8. - PubMed
-
- Norman RJ, Clark AM. Obesity and reproductive disorders: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1998;10(1):55–63. - PubMed
-
- Rich-Edwards JW, Goldman MB, Willett WC, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Adolescent body mass index and infertility caused by ovulatory disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(1):171–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
