Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability
- PMID: 27336413
- DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13321
Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability
Abstract
Since the initial demonstration of linear effects of stimulation duration and intensity on the strength of after-effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), few studies have systematically assessed how varying these parameters modulates corticospinal excitability. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the effects of anodal tDCS on corticospinal excitability at two stimulation intensities (1 mA, 2 mA) and durations (10 min, 20 min), and determine the value of several variables in predicting response. Two groups of 20 individuals received, in two separate sessions, 1 and 2 mA anodal tDCS (left primary motor cortex (M1)-right supra-orbital montage) for either 10- or 20-min. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered over left M1 and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of the contralateral hand were recorded prior to tDCS and every 5 min for 20-min post-tDCS. The following predictive variables were evaluated: I-wave recruitment, stimulation intensity, baseline M1 excitability and inter-trial MEP variability. Results show that anodal tDCS failed to significantly modulate corticospinal excitability in all conditions. Furthermore, low response rates were identified across all parameter combinations. No baseline measure was significantly correlated with increases in MEP amplitude. However, a decrease in inter-trial MEP variability was linked to response to anodal tDCS. In conclusion, the present findings are consistent with recent reports showing high levels of inter-subject variability in the neurophysiological response to tDCS, which may partly explain inconsistent group results. Furthermore, the level of variability in the neurophysiological outcome measure, i.e. MEPs, appears to be related to response.
Keywords: inter-subject variability; motor evoked potential variability; primary motor cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation.
© 2016 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 30;10:439. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00439. eCollection 2016. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27624156 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8. J Physiol. 2017. PMID: 27723104 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans.Physiol Rep. 2019 Jul;7(13):e14087. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14087. Physiol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31301123 Free PMC article.
-
Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.Brain Stimul. 2017 Jul-Aug;10(4):757-763. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 10. Brain Stimul. 2017. PMID: 28420581 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of beta-tACS on corticospinal excitability: A meta-analysis.Brain Stimul. 2019 Nov-Dec;12(6):1381-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Jul 28. Brain Stimul. 2019. PMID: 31405789
-
Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. Epub 2016 Oct 29. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017. PMID: 27866120 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimising Cognitive Enhancement: Systematic Assessment of the Effects of tDCS Duration in Older Adults.Brain Sci. 2020 May 16;10(5):304. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10050304. Brain Sci. 2020. PMID: 32429366 Free PMC article.
-
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting the Entire Motor Network Does Not Increase Corticospinal Excitability.Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 May 4;16:842954. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.842954. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35601898 Free PMC article.
-
Poststimulation time interval-dependent effects of motor cortex anodal tDCS on reaction-time task performance.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb;18(1):167-175. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0561-0. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29330825
-
Failure of tDCS to modulate motor excitability and speech motor learning.Neuropsychologia. 2020 Sep;146:107568. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107568. Epub 2020 Jul 18. Neuropsychologia. 2020. PMID: 32687836 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of aquatic therapy combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on proprioception and gait speed in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: an eight-week randomized sham-controlled trial.BMC Geriatr. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06253-5. BMC Geriatr. 2025. PMID: 40898048 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources