Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0158076.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158076. eCollection 2016.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Lupus Nephritis

Affiliations

Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Lupus Nephritis

Ioannis Parodis et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It remains unclear whether antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) alter the course of LN. We thus investigated the impact of aPL on short-term and long-term renal outcomes in patients with LN. We assessed levels of aPL cross-sectionally in SLE patients diagnosed with (n = 204) or without (n = 294) LN, and prospectively in 64 patients with active biopsy-proven LN (52 proliferative, 12 membranous), before and after induction treatment (short-term outcomes). Long-term renal outcome in the prospective LN cohort was determined by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stage, after a median follow-up of 11.3 years (range: 3.3-18.8). Cross-sectional analysis revealed no association between LN and IgG/IgM anticardiolipin or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, or lupus anticoagulant. Both aPL positivity and levels were similar in patients with active LN and non-renal SLE. Following induction treatment for LN, serum IgG/IgM aPL levels decreased in responders (p<0.005 for all), but not in non-responders. Both at active LN and post-treatment, patients with IgG, but not IgM, aPL had higher creatinine levels compared with patients without IgG aPL. Neither aPL positivity nor levels were associated with changes in eGFR from either baseline or post-treatment through long-term follow-up. Moreover, aPL positivity and levels both at baseline and post-treatment were similar in patients with a CKD stage ≥3 versus 1-2 at the last follow-up. In conclusion, neither aPL positivity nor levels were found to be associated with the occurrence of LN in SLE patients. However, IgG aPL positivity in LN patients was associated with a short-term impairment of the renal function while no effect on long-term renal outcome was observed. Furthermore, IgG and IgM aPL levels decreased following induction treatment only in responders, indicating that aPL levels are affected by immunosuppressive drugs in a response-dependent manner.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Creatinine levels (μmol/L) in LN patients with and without IgG aPL.
At baseline, creatinine levels were higher in LN patients with (n = 8) versus without (n = 56) IgG aCL (A; median: 104.5 μmol/L, range: 64–185, versus 77.0 μmol/L, range: 46–284; p = 0.03). Consistently, creatinine levels were higher in LN patients with (n = 9) versus without (n = 55) IgG anti-β2-GPI (B; median: 94.0 μmol/L, range: 64–18, versus 75.0 μmol/L, range: 46–284; p = 0.02). Similar findings were observed post-treatment, with higher creatinine levels in LN patients with (n = 6) versus without (n = 58) IgG aCL (C; median: 86.5 μmol/L, range: 72–128, versus 75.5 μmol/L, range: 40–306; p = 0.04), as well as with (n = 6) versus without (n = 58) IgG anti-β2-GPI (D; median: 86.5 μmol/L, range: 72–128, versus 75.5 μmol/L, range: 40–306; p = 0.04). Bounds of the boxes denote the 25th and 75th percentiles (IQR). Lines in the boxes denote the 50th percentile (median). Whiskers denote the range. Circles (out values, 1.5–3 IQRs further from the closest box bound) and stars (far out or extreme values, ≥3 IQRs further from the closest box bound) denote outliers. Some extreme values do not appear in the figure due to scaling. LN: lupus nephritis; aCL: anticardiolipin antibodies; anti-β2-GPI: anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies.

References

    1. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2): 295–306. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levine JS, Branch DW, Rauch J. The antiphospholipid syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(10): 752–63. 10.1056/NEJMra002974 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Practice ACoO. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;77(1): 67–75. - PubMed
    1. Hughes GR, Harris NN, Gharavi AE. The anticardiolipin syndrome. J Rheumatol. 1986;13(3): 486–9. - PubMed
    1. Arnaud L, Mathian A, Devilliers H, Ruffatti A, Tektonidou M, Forastiero R, et al. Patient-level analysis of five international cohorts further confirms the efficacy of aspirin for the primary prevention of thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14(3): 192–200. 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.10.019 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms