Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 24:16:203.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1466-7.

The swine flu vaccine, public attitudes, and researcher interpretations: a systematic review of qualitative research

Benedicte Carlsen  1 , Claire Glenton  2
Affiliations

The swine flu vaccine, public attitudes, and researcher interpretations: a systematic review of qualitative research

Benedicte Carlsen et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: During pandemics, health authorities may be uncertain about the spread and severity of the disease and the effectiveness and safety of available interventions. This was the case during the swine flu (H1N1) pandemic of 2009-2010, and governments were forced to make decisions despite these uncertainties. While many countries chose to implement wide scale vaccination programmes, few accomplished their vaccination goals. Many research studies aiming to explore barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake have been conducted in the aftermath of the pandemic, including several qualitative studies.

Aims: 1. To explore public attitudes to the swine flu vaccine in different countries through a review of qualitative primary studies. 2. To describe and discuss the implications drawn by the primary study authors.

Methods: Systematic review of qualitative research studies, using a broadly comparative cross case-study approach. Study quality was appraised using an adaptation of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) quality assessment tool.

Results: The review indicates that the public had varying opinions about disease risk and prevalence and had concerns about vaccine safety. Most primary study authors concluded that participants were uninformed, and that more information about the disease and the vaccine would have led to an increase in vaccine uptake. We find these conclusions problematic. We suggest instead that people's questions and concerns were legitimate given the uncertainties of the situation at the time and the fact that the authorities did not have the necessary information to convince the public. Our quality assessment of the included studies points to a lack of reflexivity and a lack of information about study context. We suggest that these study weaknesses are tied to primary study authors' lack of acknowledgement of the uncertainties surrounding the disease and the vaccine.

Conclusion: While primary study authors suggest that authorities could increase vaccine uptake through increased information, we suggest instead that health authorities should be more transparent in their information and decision-making processes in future pandemic situations.

Keywords: H1N1; Pandemic; Qualitative research; Reflexivity; Research context; Swine flu; Systematic review; Vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart. Overview over search and selection process leading to final sample of 16 included studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO . Implementation of the international health regulations (2005) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. CDC . Outbreak of swine-origin influenza a (H1N1) virus infection. Mexico: CDC - Centers for Disease Control and prevention; 2009. p. 17.
    1. WHO. Standardization of terminology of the pandemic A(H1N1)2009 virus: World Health Organization; 2011 [cited 2014 24.04.]. Available from: http://www.who.int/influenza/gisrs_laboratory/terminology_ah1n1pdm09/en/.
    1. Mereckiene J, Cotter S, Weber JT, Nicoll A, D'Ancona F, Lopalco PL, et al. Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination policies and coverage in Europe. 2012;17(4):Euro Surveill. Url: http://www.lenus.ie/hse/handle/10147/302396. - PubMed
    1. Amato-Gauci A, Zucs P, Snacken R, Ciancio B, Lopez V, Broberg E, et al. The 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic in Europe. A review of the experience. Stockholm: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC); 2010.

Publication types

Substances