Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Jun 23;14(1):186.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0941-6.

Interaction between polyphenols intake and PON1 gene variants on markers of cardiovascular disease: a nutrigenetic observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Interaction between polyphenols intake and PON1 gene variants on markers of cardiovascular disease: a nutrigenetic observational study

Federica Rizzi et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) gene polymorphisms and polyphenols intake have been reported independently associated to lipid profile and susceptibility to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. However, the interaction between these factors remains to be investigated. We performed an observational nutrigenetic study to examine whether the interaction between polyphenols and anthocyanins intake and PON1 genetic variants can modulate biomarkers of cardiovascular health in an Italian healthy population.

Methods: We recruited 443 healthy volunteers who participated in the EC funded ATHENA project (AnThocyanin and polyphenols bioactive for Health Enhancement through Nutritional Advancement). Data collection included detailed demographic, clinical, dietary, lifestyle, biochemical and genetic data. Polyphenols and anthocyanins intake was measured by 24 h dietary recall repeated three times a year in order to get seasonal variations. We tested the interaction between 18 independent tagging SNPs in PON1 gene and polyphenols intake on HDL, LDL, cholesterol, triglycerides and atherogenic index of plasma.

Results: Without considering the genetic background, we could not observe significant differences in the lipid profile between high and low polyphenols and anthocyanins intake. Using a nutrigenetic approach, we identified protective genotypes in four independent polymorphisms that, at Bonferroni level (p ≤ 0.0028), present a significant association with increased HDL level under high polyphenols and anthocyanins intake, compared to risk genotypes (rs854549, Beta = 4.7 per C allele; rs854552, Beta = 5.6 per C allele; rs854571, Beta = 3.92 per T allele; rs854572, Beta = 3.94 per C allele).

Conclusions: We highlight the protective role of genetic variants in PON1 towards cardiovascular risk under high polyphenols and anthocyanins consumption. PON1 variants could represent novel biomarkers to stratify individuals who might benefit from targeted dietary recommendation for health promotion and strategies of preventive medicine.

Keywords: Anthocyanins; Antioxidants; Gene diet interaction; Genetic variants; HDL; Lipid profile; Nutrigenomics; PON1 gene; Polyphenols.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Phenotypes distribution relative to genotypes at best SNPs according to anthocyanins and polyphenols intakes. rs854549 (a), rs854551 (b), rs854552 (c), rs3917477 (d), rs854571 (e) and rs854572 (f). Y axis reports the residuals calculated for each phenotype (HDL, AIP and cholesterol) adjusted for age, sex, BMI and the first ten principal components. The bars summarize the distribution as mean and standard errors. For each bar, the numbers of individuals per genotype are indicated. PGxE denotes the SNP x environment interaction analysis comparing high and low intake both for anthocyanins (ac) and polyphenols (df). P indicates the multivariate linear regression analysis comparing genotypes in each environment subgroup (low/high); Beta coefficients refer to minor alleles

References

    1. Fuster V. Global burden of cardiovascular disease: time to implement feasible strategies and to monitor results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:520–522. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1151. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deaton C, Froelicher ES, Wu LH, Ho C, Shishani K, Jaarsma T. The global burden of cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;10(Suppl 2):S5–S13. - PubMed
    1. Daar AS, Singer PA, Persad DL, Pramming SK, Matthews DR, Beaglehole R, et al. Grand challenges in chronic non-communicable diseases. Nature. 2007;450:494–496. doi: 10.1038/450494a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Niebylski ML, Redburn KA, Duhaney T, Campbell NR. Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: a systematic review of the evidence. Nutrition. 2015;31:787–795. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2014.12.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Roos B. Personalised nutrition: ready for practice? Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72:48–52. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112002844. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types