Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 7;17(6):881.
doi: 10.3390/ijms17060881.

Development of an in Silico Model of DPPH• Free Radical Scavenging Capacity: Prediction of Antioxidant Activity of Coumarin Type Compounds

Affiliations

Development of an in Silico Model of DPPH• Free Radical Scavenging Capacity: Prediction of Antioxidant Activity of Coumarin Type Compounds

Elizabeth Goya Jorge et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study of the 2,2-diphenyl-l-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•) radical scavenging ability of 1373 chemical compounds, using DRAGON molecular descriptors (MD) and the neural network technique, a technique based on the multilayer multilayer perceptron (MLP), was developed. The built model demonstrated a satisfactory performance for the training ( R 2 = 0.713 ) and test set ( Q ext 2 = 0.654 ) , respectively. To gain greater insight on the relevance of the MD contained in the MLP model, sensitivity and principal component analyses were performed. Moreover, structural and mechanistic interpretation was carried out to comprehend the relationship of the variables in the model with the modeled property. The constructed MLP model was employed to predict the radical scavenging ability for a group of coumarin-type compounds. Finally, in order to validate the model's predictions, an in vitro assay for one of the compounds (4-hydroxycoumarin) was performed, showing a satisfactory proximity between the experimental and predicted pIC50 values.

Keywords: DPPH•; MLP; QSAR; antioxidant; artificial neural networks; coumarin; free radical scavenger.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regression plane of relation between targets, output and standard residuals values of the analyzed variable (pIC50).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between experimental and predicted pIC50.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis of the MD for the MLP 14-9-1 model.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diagram of variable importance according to the PCA.

References

    1. Valko M., Leibfritz D., Moncol J., Cronin M., Mazur M., Telser J. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007;39:44–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magalhaes L.M., Segundo M.A., Reis S., Lima J.L.F.C. Methodological aspects about in vitro evaluation of antioxidant properties. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2008;613:1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.047. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang D., Ou B., Prior R.L. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53:1841–1856. doi: 10.1021/jf030723c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scalzo J., Mezzetti B., Battino M. Total antioxidant capacity evaluation: Critical steps for assaying berry antioxidant features. BioFactors. 2005;23:221–227. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520230407. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Niki E. Assessment of Antioxidant Capacity in vitro and in vivo. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 2010;49:503–515. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.04.016. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources